Re: Some strange results between spamd and spamc

2009-05-18 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 22:50 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Pieter De Wit wrote: > > Here is the weird part - some mail comes up as spam when I hand it over to > > spamd, but if I take the archive file and strip the header (EHLO etc) out, > > save it it gets a MUCH lower score - I am talking 5.7/5.0

Re: Some strange results between spamd and spamc

2009-05-17 Thread Matt Kettler
Pieter De Wit wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am pretty sure I covered this well, but I saw some strange happenings > over the last couple of days. I don't have access to the box to copy and > paste the results so this goes from memory (thought I would get the ball > rolling) > > I am writing my own custom

Some strange results between spamd and spamc

2009-05-17 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hi Guys, I am pretty sure I covered this well, but I saw some strange happenings over the last couple of days. I don't have access to the box to copy and paste the results so this goes from memory (thought I would get the ball rolling) I am writing my own custom milter for sendmail. I use the fo