Re: Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

Hi, Were these rules, or an improved variant, added to the rules? Regards, Simon. On 16/02/12 01:43, neon_overload wrote: > Hello, > > I have created some rules which I have found to be very effective so far at > identifying a certain type of spam that spamassassin otherwises cannot > detec

Re: Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

On 16 Feb 2012, at 18:11 , neon_overload wrote: > I have been hard at work on tweaking these rules and have come up with new > versions which appear more effective. Have not spent much time on > performance though. Curious how you arrived at the scoring. For example, I would thing that LOCAL_U_U

Re: Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

R_TEXT /([A-Z][a-z]*(\s[a-z]+){4,6}\.?\s?){18}/ describe LOCAL_FILLER_TEXT Long sequence of 5-7 word sentences with capital only at start score LOCAL_FILLER_TEXT 0.4 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Some-rules-I-created-for-suspicious-Javascript-practices-tp3130p33340124.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

r the WTFPL which is GPL and Apache license # compatible." -- Thomas Rutter/neon_overload to SA-users, 2012-02-16 00:43 UTC # http://old.nabble.com/Some-rules-I-created-for-suspicious-Javascript-practices-tt3130.html # # WTFPL 2.0 basically says "rename things and they're essent

Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

the context of "how to get through spam filters". Use these as you wish! I hereby license them under the WTFPL which is GPL and Apache license compatible. Thomas Rutter -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Some-rules-I-created-for-suspicious-Javascript-practices-tp3130p3130.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.