Cool.
Have to turn up logging to 2, but I'll try it on Monday and see what that
brings.
Thanks,
Kurt
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 13:30
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Kurt Buff
Subject: Re: Soliciting advice fro
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I would love to know how this report was generated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Generally speaking, it was was sa-stats.pl found in the tools
> > directory of the SA 3.0.1 tarball.
> >
> > Specifically speaking:
> > sa-stats
Matthew said...
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:02:03 -0500 (EST), JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
> > > Report Date : 2004-12-10
> > > Period Beginning : Thu 09 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
> > > Period Ending: Fri 10 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
> >
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:02:03 -0500 (EST), JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
> > Report Date : 2004-12-10
> > Period Beginning : Thu 09 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
> > Period Ending: Fri 10 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
> >
> > Reporting Period : 24
From: Michael Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > Hash Busting - slightly modify each copy of message to foil
> > > 'fingerprinting' techniques
> >
> > SpamAssassin does not use message fingerprinting, so this is
> > irrelevant.
>-Original Message-
>From: JP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:02 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Soliciting advice from the list members
>
>
>> Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
>> Report
Kris Deugau wrote:
Rob Kudyba wrote:
Well there is a company that sprouted from Vipul's Razor that uses
the concept of collaborative filtering and adaptive learning from
over a million trusted users, in a type of-- if you will--"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
net"--(ah hem) and I don't believe this 'net is i
Rob Kudyba wrote:
> Well there is a company that sprouted from Vipul's Razor that uses
> the concept of collaborative filtering and adaptive learning from
> over a million trusted users, in a type of-- if you will--"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> net"--(ah hem) and I don't believe this 'net is incorporated in
> Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
> Report Date : 2004-12-10
> Period Beginning : Thu 09 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
> Period Ending: Fri 10 Dec 2004 06:00:00 AM PST
>
> Reporting Period : 24.00 hrs
> --
I would love to know h
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Hash Busting - slightly modify each copy of message to foil
> > 'fingerprinting' techniques
>
> SpamAssassin does not use message fingerprinting, so this is
> irrelevant.
I was under the impression that razor and pyzor were "finger
Adam,
I'm sure everyone else that replies may say basically the same as me,
but here's my input about SA and your management's questions.
> Hash Busting - slightly modify each copy of message to foil
> 'fingerprinting' techniques
AFAIK, the fingerprinting techinques are "fuzzy" and can withstand
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:04:28 -0500, Adam Lanier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> My managment has recently asked me how SpamAssassin is prepared to deal
> with a number of recent trends in spam technology. This was prompted by
> a recent seminar the
And the key point is that if commercial anti-spam vendors
are using points such as these to either differentiate
themselves from other commercial efforts or SpamAssassin,
they're either:
A) Using SpamAssassin underneath
B) Inferior to SpamAssassin
C) Equivalent functionally to SpamAssassin
Jeff C.
amassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Soliciting advice from the list members
>
> And the key point is that if commercial anti-spam vendors
> are using points such as these to either differentiate
> themselves from other commercial efforts or SpamAssassin,
> they're either:
>
>
On Thursday, December 9, 2004, 8:28:47 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> These are the recent trends raised by my management:
>>
>> Hash Busting - slightly modify each copy of message to foil
>> 'fingerprinting' techniques
> Since SA doesn't do fingerprinting this doesn't have quite the desired
> effect.
> These are the recent trends raised by my management:
>
> Hash Busting - slightly modify each copy of message to foil
> 'fingerprinting' techniques
Since SA doesn't do fingerprinting this doesn't have quite the desired
effect.
It can break a meta rule looking for particular text, but the quick an
From: Adam Lanier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My managment has recently asked me how SpamAssassin is prepared to
> deal with a number of recent trends in spam technology. This was
> prompted by a recent seminar they attended regarding spam (provided
> by an anti-spam vendor who shall remain nam
Forget education! Let's go straight for punishment... Why bother with
the middleman.
:)
To put a nail in this coffin, we have had great results with SA on how
it has been dynamically able to pickup the new SPAM. We tie it in to
bayes, awl, SURBL and the plethora of custom rule sets (updated by
>-Original Message-
>From: Adam Lanier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 4:04 PM
>To: SA List
>Subject: Soliciting advice from the list members
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>My managment has rece
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My managment has recently asked me how SpamAssassin is prepared to deal
with a number of recent trends in spam technology. This was prompted by
a recent seminar they attended regarding spam (provided by an anti-spam
vendor who shall remain nameless).
N
20 matches
Mail list logo
