Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-20 Thread Spam Admin
Details on configuration. Both machines, ma1 and ma2 are identical. We are running: sendmail spamhaus.org blacklist which rejects the majority of mail so SpamAssassin does not have to process that chunk of mail. spamd (spamassassin) - 2 instances of spamd on each machine. mimedefang clamav a f

Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-18 Thread jp
We have local DNS servers and cache/have feeds to some of the blacklists to help with the network testing processing. This is what we have observed too. We have watched top for observing memory use, CPU use (user versus idle versus wait), and slow network tests will cause the spamd childs to ke

Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-18 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 18/03/2008 1:39 PM, Spam Admin wrote: > Spam Admin wrote: >> Yes, the hardware is identical. The MX records are both '10', and the >> volume of mail is slightly LESS on the 3.2.4 machine over the 3.1.9 >> it's taking more time to process less mail on the newer machine. - are you running the sa

Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Spam Admin
Yes, the hardware is identical. The MX records are both '10', and the volume of mail is slightly LESS on the 3.2.4 machine over the 3.1.9 it's taking more time to process less mail on the newer machine. We have 2.5 Gig memory on each machine. Our graphs show that we are using about 1.5 Gig of

Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Kris Deugau
Spam Admin wrote: I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the standard rules that come with each version. The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the 'load' on 3.1.9. I'

Re: Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Spam Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and > the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the standard > rules that come with each version. > > The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the

Slow processing with 3.2.4

2008-03-13 Thread Spam Admin
I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the standard rules that come with each version. The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the 'load' on 3.1.9. Do others have the sam