Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-17 Thread Jeff Chan
Quoting martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > also sprach Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]: > > The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct > > rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case > > postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssassin check of

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.16.2031 +0200]: > It will not have rejected them as it doesn't analyze URI's in bodies. That > talk was about URIDNSBL, not about RBL checks in general. aye. Then please pretend I never opened my mouth. In that case I'd have to agree that if y

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Martin f krafft wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:08:35 +0200: > I disagree. You can disable those RBLs in SA which are already in > use at the postfix perimeter. Postfix will have rejected all > matching mail, so SpamAssassin would never find a match. It will not have rejected them as it doesn't anal

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread Duane Hill
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 at 13:08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: also sprach Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]: The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssass

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread SM
At 04:08 16-08-2007, martin f krafft wrote: I disagree. You can disable those RBLs in SA which are already in use at the postfix perimeter. Postfix will have rejected all matching mail, so SpamAssassin would never find a match. Isn't the RBL checks in Postfix done on the IP address of the remot

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]: > The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct > rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case > postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssassin check of web sites in > message bodies. Specifically it checks

RE: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
> > Hello All, > > > > I'm using BL in my main.cf config like this: > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > . > > . > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > > reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, > > reject_rbl_client safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net, > > reject_rb

Re: Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread Jeff Chan
Quoting Leon Kolchinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello All, > > I'm using BL in my main.cf config like this: > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > . > . > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, > reject_rbl_client safe.dnsbl.sorbs.ne

Should I disable URIDNSBL plugin if I'm already rejecting based on BL with MTA

2007-08-16 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
Hello All, I'm using BL in my main.cf config like this: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = . . reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org, . . So actuall