Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Kettler
ram wrote: So would you suggest I remove all shortcircuit on DNS Rules. Is there anyway I can get USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST evaluated before All other tests No.. It's a DNS based test, so it would be counterproductive to try to make one run before the others. For the cases where USER_IN_SPF_W

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread ram
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 19:48 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > ram wrote: > > Hi > > > > In my local.cf I have > > > > -- > > score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100 > > > > priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000 > > priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800 > > > > > > shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on > > sh

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Michael Parker
On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote: Benny, you might want to read the docs: docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not working so here Hmmm then you are running a faulty or modified version I guess,

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote: > Benny, you might want to read the docs: docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not working so here -- Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Matt Kettler
ram wrote: Hi In my local.cf I have -- score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100 priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000 priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800 shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL spam -- So I expect RCVD_IN_XBL to be evaluated after USER_IN_SPF_WHI

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Michael Parker
On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Larry Nedry wrote: On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and 10 would be tested before 0 :-) And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, June 26, 20

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Larry Nedry
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: >make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and >10 would be tested before 0 :-) And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: >On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote: >> Negative numbers co

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote: > That is not correct. so then sagrey is brokken > Negative numbers come before positive numbers. nope order is positive to negative you might find it is correct by testing more :) -- Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Michael Parker
On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote: How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited rules of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive ones make priority positive not negative, default all h

Re: Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote: > How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited rules > of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive > ones make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and 10 would be tested before

Short circuit priority doesnt seem to work

2008-06-26 Thread ram
Hi In my local.cf I have -- score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100 priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000 priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800 shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL spam -- So I expect RCVD_IN_XBL to be evaluated after USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST , but