Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread mouss
Bret Miller a écrit : > > They have rationale. You can read it. They do not, however, as far as I > know, state exactly what makes them think a message they receive is spam > or legitimate. > > To quote them: > > "MXRate is not really a blacklist in the traditional sense. Our system > analyzes d

RE: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Bret Miller
> > I use it or I wouldn't have known how to use it. ;) > > > > Like most other DNS blacklists, I wouldn't trust it > completely. Whether > > something is "spam" depends largely on the perception of the person > > reviewing it. I don't know how you get in one list or another for > > mxrate, > > If

Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread mouss
Bret Miller a écrit : > > I use it or I wouldn't have known how to use it. ;) > > Like most other DNS blacklists, I wouldn't trust it completely. Whether > something is "spam" depends largely on the perception of the person > reviewing it. I don't know how you get in one list or another for > mxr

Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana
Bret Miller wrote: Not SenderBase specifically, but MXRate is a similar service. See www.mxrate.com for information. Ah, Alligate, the server that "test incoming mail for RFC compliance", but lacks a proper behaviour on RSET. I hope this service is more sane. Any

RE: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Bret Miller
> > Not SenderBase specifically, but MXRate is a similar service. See > > www.mxrate.com for information. > > Ah, Alligate, the server that "test incoming mail for RFC compliance", > but lacks a proper behaviour on RSET. > > I hope this service is more sane. Anybody with experience > with MX? Might

Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Bret Miller wrote: > Not SenderBase specifically, but MXRate is a similar service. See > www.mxrate.com for information. Ah, Alligate, the server that "test incoming mail for RFC compliance", but lacks a proper behaviour on RSET. I hope this service is more sane. Anybody with experience with MX?

Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:37:49AM -0300, Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote: > Does anyone know how to use Sender Base to check e-mails with SpamAssassin? > For those who doesn't know Sender Base : www.senderbase.org. It's actually pretty easy, however we've specifically been a

RE: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Bret Miller
> Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Does anyone know how to use Sender Base to check e-mails with > > SpamAssassin? > > > > For those who doesn't know Sender Base : www.senderbase.org. > > And to quote senderbase: &

Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Matt Kettler
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does anyone know how to use Sender Base to check e-mails with > SpamAssassin? > > For those who doesn't know Sender Base : www.senderbase.org. And to quote senderbase: "SenderBase is a reporting tool used by network a

Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana
Hi guys, Does anyone know how to use Sender Base to check e-mails with SpamAssassin? For those who doesn't know Sender Base : www.senderbase.org. Thanks, Jeff

Sender Base

2005-03-30 Thread martin smith
Hi, I have been playing about with senderbase a bit and have noticed that SB_NSP_VOLUME_SPIKE is looking for S5 to be NSP but have also noticed that they use unknown and in the case of my provider NTL the field is blank. I tried: header SB_NSP_VOLUME_SPIKE eval:check_rbl_sub('sb', 'sb:S5 =~ /[^I