On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
> Somewhat related questions:
>
> 1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
> the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
That depends on ho
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:10:56 -0500 (CDT)
Shane Williams wrote:
> Somewhat related questions:
>
> 1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
> the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
> toward meta-rules?
AFAIK
> 2. Is there a way to create
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
That depends on how it's used in the meta rule. If it's used as
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
2. Is there a way to create a local rule that uses the DKIM/SPF
information such that I could match to other h
