Thank you,
Yes, DCC Razor and Pyzor are installed and running.
I will look into your other suggestions and let you know.
On 1/30/18 1:37 PM, David Jones wrote:
On 01/30/2018 11:47 AM, Computer Bob wrote:
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
---
On 01/30/2018 11:47 AM, Computer Bob wrote:
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
---
# Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails
#
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM***
Also:
I modified the following SA local.cf items:
---
# Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails
#
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* < Uncommented
# Use Bayesian class
Follow-up,
I did a dist-upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and the process whacked the SA bad.
Removal and purging of SA was necessary and a fresh reinstall brought it
back.
It is currently "factory fresh".
Still my problems persist, I am pursuing this via the Amavis mail list
as command line calls
On 27/01/2018 19:29, Ralph Seichter wrote:
I trust you are aware that you actually penalise senders which pass the
SPF check if you use a greater-than-zero score? Minus signs matter. ;-)
Sure it's a "penalization", but of an order of magnitude so little that
a minus, albeit more logically cor
Daniele Duca skrev den 2018-01-27 11:35:
You are spot on, spammers are much more competent in setting up
spf/dkim than most of legit mail administrators.
sadly true
I personally score spf/dkim that passes at 0 and only penalize the
fails
score 0 is disable tag if it littery 0
i just white
On 27.01.18 16:32, Daniele Duca wrote:
> > score SPF_PASS -0.001
> > score SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001
>
> I know, I meant to write that I score them at 0.001 (no minus sign in
> my case) but I'm lazy :)
I trust you are aware that you actually penalise senders which pass the
SPF check if you use a great
On 27/01/2018 14:01, David Jones wrote:
If you set those to 0, then you could be disabling many other helpful
meta rules that use them. It is recommended to set them to a very
small non-zero number as others have said:
score SPF_PASS -0.001
score SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001
I know, I meant to wr
On 01/27/2018 04:35 AM, Daniele Duca wrote:
On 26/01/2018 23:54, David B Funk wrote:
Regardless, giving -1 score for SPF_PASS and another -1 for
SPF_HELO_PASS is nontrivial DainBRamage.
It's trivial for a spammer to set up SPF on a throw-away domain and
thus waltz thru that kind of filteri
On 26/01/2018 23:54, David B Funk wrote:
Regardless, giving -1 score for SPF_PASS and another -1 for
SPF_HELO_PASS is nontrivial DainBRamage.
It's trivial for a spammer to set up SPF on a throw-away domain and
thus waltz thru that kind of filtering.
On 27.01.18 11:35, Daniele Duca wrote:
You
On 26/01/2018 23:54, David B Funk wrote:
Regardless, giving -1 score for SPF_PASS and another -1 for
SPF_HELO_PASS is nontrivial DainBRamage.
It's trivial for a spammer to set up SPF on a throw-away domain and
thus waltz thru that kind of filtering.
You are spot on, spammers are much more
On 26.01.18 14:39, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
I have an issue with my setup somehow and it may be in amavis-new,
most spam gets detected and delt with, some gets through and the
scoring seems odd.
The headers that get through are usually along the lines of:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.
On 26 Jan 2018, at 17:47 (-0500), Computer Bob wrote:
My understanding is that spamassassin is configured for razor and
uribl.
amavisd-new is configured to call spamassassin so is spamassassin not
doing the sub calls ?
Not exactly. The command-line 'spamassassin' script is written in Perl
an
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***
My understanding is that spamassassin is configured for razor and uribl.
amavisd-new is configured to call spamassassin so is spamassassin not
doing the sub calls ?
I see no docs on configuring razor directly in amavis.
If you could tell me what to look for it would be appreciated.
On 1/26/18
Ok, I will look now, what am I looking for ?
On 1/26/18 4:20 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com
X-
I did not think so, but will check another day.
15 hours is enough for today.
On 1/26/18 4:20 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
M1-2.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.0 re
On 01/26/2018 02:39 PM, b...@inter-control.com wrote:
Greetings to all,
I have an issue with my setup somehow and it may be in amavis-new, most
spam gets detected and delt with, some gets through and the scoring
seems odd.
The headers that get through are usually along the lines of:
X-Spam-F
Greetings to all,
I have an issue with my setup somehow and it may be in amavis-new, most
spam gets detected and delt with, some gets through and the scoring
seems odd.
The headers that get through are usually along the lines of:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Statu
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:08:54 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * David Jones :
>
> > Are you hitting the URIBL_BLOCKED rule? If so, please follow the
> > link in that reddit article to get rid of that rule hit. This is
> > very important.
>
> Yes, but that's not his problem -- since the URIBL
* David Jones :
> Are you hitting the URIBL_BLOCKED rule? If so, please follow the
> link in that reddit article to get rid of that rule hit. This is very
> important.
Yes, but that's not his problem -- since the URIBL query fails in both
delivery AND his test.
The actual differences are that
* W B :
> Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails scores
> that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's assigning as
> emails come in are different from the results of running SpamAssassin -t on
> that same email after the fact.
So, how is SpamAssassi
I actually had no idea SpamAssassin could do bayesian training - I'm an
idiot. Lol. Thank you for pointing that out to me!
On 4/19/2017 2:56 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400
W B wrote:
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
scores that are way low
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:54:03 -0400
W B wrote:
> You guys are all correct. Somehow I've been overlooking that message
> - I must have misread something. Either way, thank you so much for
> the help; I've set up unbound, so hopefully that should solve the
> issue.
It probably wont. It's a significa
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:36:24 -0400
W B wrote:
> Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
> scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores
> it's assigning as emails come in are different from the results of
> running SpamAssassin -t on that same email
W B
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SpamAssassin scoring issues
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's
assigning as emails come
>From: W B
>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:36 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: SpamAssassin scoring issues
>Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
>scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it&
W B skrev den 2017-04-19 20:36:
https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/660n2w/spamassassin_scores_are_oddly_low_different_from/
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
have you readed this and solved it ?
Hey all! I'm having issues with SpamAssassin; it's assigning emails
scores that are way lower than it should. In addition, the scores it's
assigning as emails come in are different from the results of running
SpamAssassin -t on that same email after the fact.
I'd like to avoid posting too much
30 matches
Mail list logo
