At 04:05 AM 2/1/2005, Gray, Richard wrote:
So it seems resonable for me to write a meta rule for each rule that
checks if a DUL list has been hit and adds a small extra score on?
I assume from what you say that evaluating meta rules is very cheap, so
they shouldn't impact performance by much.
Corre
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 January 2005 14:55
To: Gray, Richard; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Scalar modifiers
At 06:54 AM 1/28/2005, Gray, Richard wrote:
>My concern regard processing time. This is basically going to double
>the number of rules in t
At 06:54 AM 1/28/2005, Gray, Richard wrote:
My concern regard processing time. This is basically going to double the
number of rules in the SA files. Is SA's meta rule logic greedy? E.g. by
putting the DUL rule first if it fails on this will it check the other
aspects of the rule? Are there any oth
Hi all,
I'd like to implement within SpamAssassin (2.64) the ability to scale a
spam score based on a certain rule (specifically, I want to scale the
spam score by 1.5 if its from an IP listed as a DUL)
My basic theory is that if I take every rule and build a meta rule from
it that includes the
