Re: Sa-update and proxy servers

2011-02-18 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 2/17/2011 11:44 PM, Daniel Lemke wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: [...] I now need to set a proxy server to do sa-updates through, but could not find any information on settings for a proxy server. [...] Added cmd options: -x --proxy -U --proxy-user -P --proxy-password -t --connect

Re: Sa-update and proxy servers

2011-02-18 Thread Daniel Lemke
h to provide such a feature is kind of weird. Would it be possible to make the patch official? At least it'd be great if one could specify username and password in addition to the proxy url by using environment variables for LWP::Agent. Any comments on this? Daniel -- View this message

RE: Sa-update and proxy servers

2006-06-25 Thread Michael Scheidell
Wonder if that would help the cronjob. Guess that might do it. Especially since sa-update does use the LWP libaries. That's just like *NIX utilities. 57 varaties of how to do the same job.

Re: Sa-update and proxy servers

2006-06-25 Thread Radoslaw Zielinski
Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24-06-2006 17:28]: [...] > I now need to set a proxy server to do sa-updates through, but could not > find any information on settings for a proxy server. echo 'alias sa-update="http_proxy=http://login:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/ ' \ 'sa-update"' >> ~/.p

RE: Sa-update and proxy servers

2006-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Scheidell > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:28 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Sa-update and proxy servers > Patch attached. (works here(tm)) In fact, my nightly cronjob runs 'sa-cover' script: (exit

Sa-update and proxy servers

2006-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
I think I noticed small change in sa-update for 3.13. It is now using port 8090 for outgoing connections. (or did it always?) This happened to make it immediately fail on servers in the DMZ which have a strict set of outgoing egress rules. I now need to set a proxy server to do sa-updates throug