Re: SV: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Michael Scheidell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The list managers are the first ones who have to change. >> >> > > Yes, you are probably right. But: there must be a reason why the > rule no_real_name exists? And if there is a rule (written or not) > that From: headers should contain a real name, I want to follow

RE: SV: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Sietse van Zanen
t is spam is considerable and it should be scored a couple of points. -Sietse From: Chris Lear Sent: Thu 07-Dec-06 15:06 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SV: Help with understanding a rule * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (07/12/06 12:03): The list managers are the first ones who have t

Re: SV: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Chris Lear
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (07/12/06 12:03): The list managers are the first ones who have to change. Yes, you are probably right. But: there must be a reason why the rule no_real_name exists? And if there is a rule (written or not) that From: headers should contain a real name, I want to follo

SV: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Magnus.Ekhall
>The list managers are the first ones who have to change. > Yes, you are probably right. But: there must be a reason why the rule no_real_name exists? And if there is a rule (written or not) that From: headers should contain a real name, I want to follow it. And to follow it I need to convince my