Re: SURBL questions

2006-12-19 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, December 19, 2006, 7:19:51 PM, Theo Dinter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:47:15PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: >> "http://refinance-poiku07-com"; >> >> In the cgi lookup linked above, the subdomain does not hit, but the main >> domain does. Should SA be looking at the domain

Re: SURBL questions

2006-12-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:47:15PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: > "http://refinance-poiku07-com"; > > In the cgi lookup linked above, the subdomain does not hit, but the main > domain does. Should SA be looking at the domain for surbl checks or not? It should only be looking at the domain.

SURBL questions

2006-12-19 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, I'm not completely understanding how these checks work... I'm seeing some email with a URL in it that hits at the online surbl checker (http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi), but not in spamassassin with the default uribl rules. Plugin is enabled and it does work on a good