On 9/9/06, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:Bug 5077 includes a one line patch to fix this. It'll be included in3.1.6 but is trivial to apply by hand now.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5077I seem to have multiple versions of SPF.pm on m
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>>
>> (yes, I looked up the ip address and pulled a txt record from aol, and
>> yes, the ips are in the range, and yes, I have gotten SPF_SOFTFAIL from
>> domains without any spf records)
>
> Bug 5077 includes a one line patch to fix this. It'll be included in
> 3.1.6 b
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM
To: Michel Vaillancourt
Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: SPF Scores
Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores?
Because if
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM
> To: Michel Vaillancourt
> Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: SPF Scores
>
>
> Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores?
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> I set up SPF for Wolfstar.ca yesterday, and I've been reading a bit off
> the website about SPF itself. WRT to SA, I'm interested in knowing if folks
> have adjusted their "stock" SPF scores or if they've done some custom
I set up SPF for Wolfstar.ca yesterday, and I've been reading a bit off
the website about SPF itself. WRT to SA, I'm interested in knowing if folks
have adjusted their "stock" SPF scores or if they've done some custom rules to
lever this technology?
--
