On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:23 AM, mouss wrote:
> sigh. if you can't understand what "privacy" means, then you are part of
> the problem.
Ham corpus "may" conflict with privacy, but it does not necessarily
have to. An example is the old ~2005 ham corpus. People can decide
which emails to share, and
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:51:14 +
RW wrote:
> Is there anything to prevent spammers signing up and using your
> databases to autogenerate spam?
Not really, but then we only make our database available to customers
using our commercial product, so the cost would probably deter
spammers.
> It so
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:25:06 -0500
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:23:39 +0100
> mouss wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > you need to train with _your_mail. do not train with somebody else's
> > mail. one of the defence args is that attackers can't guess your
> > setup. if every one of us
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:23:39 +0100
mouss wrote:
[...]
> you need to train with _your_mail. do not train with somebody else's
> mail. one of the defence args is that attackers can't guess your
> setup. if every one of us uses the same corpus then it'll be easy for
> an attacker to get around.
Th
http://untroubled.org/spam/ --> for spam, updated daily.
--Marco Túlio
*Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Glória*
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:23 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 12/01/2011 23:02, Mahmoud Khonji a écrit :
> > I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to sen
Le 12/01/2011 23:02, Mahmoud Khonji a écrit :
> I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to send me his SPAM/Ham email
> collection.
sigh. if you can't understand what "privacy" means, then you are part of
the problem.
>
> I need it to train and test classifiers.
you need to train with _yo
I would highly appreciate if anyone is able to send me his SPAM/Ham email
collection.
I need it to train and test classifiers.
The issue with available corpus is that they are outdated. They generally
date back in 2005, and lot has changed since then -- We've got SPAMers with
spell checkers at le
