Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:53:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
> > We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also
> > hit a few other rules that pushed it over our reject threshold of
> > 10, and easily over th
yep -- feel free to send me over copies of FP messages (or strings
that match them)
2010/4/16 Karsten Bräckelmann :
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
>> We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also
>> hit a few other rules that pushed it over our rejec
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
> We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also
> hit a few other rules that pushed it over our reject threshold of
> 10, and easily over the 'junk mail folder' level of 5.
>
> I managed to get them to send me the message
Hi,
We had a legitimate e-mail hit the JM_SOUGHT_3 yesterday. It also
hit a few other rules that pushed it over our reject threshold of
10, and easily over the 'junk mail folder' level of 5.
I managed to get them to send me the message, and it hits rule
__SEEK_5ID3LI "Conti nuum Intern ational P
