Re: SMP and Make

2004-10-04 Thread Teun Vink
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 17:25 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:24:02PM -0400, Tim B wrote: > > what are the best options to use when building SpamAssassin on an SMP > > system? and during which step do I use those switches? > > You don't really get any benefit out of the

Re: SMP and Make

2004-10-04 Thread Tim B
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:24:02PM -0400, Tim B wrote: what are the best options to use when building SpamAssassin on an SMP system? and during which step do I use those switches? You don't really get any benefit out of the "-j" switch in our "make". There's only 1 thing w

Re: SMP and Make

2004-10-04 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:24:02PM -0400, Tim B wrote: > what are the best options to use when building SpamAssassin on an SMP > system? and during which step do I use those switches? You don't really get any benefit out of the "-j" switch in our "make". There's only 1 thing which gets compiled,

SMP and Make

2004-10-04 Thread Tim B
what are the best options to use when building SpamAssassin on an SMP system? and during which step do I use those switches?