Re: SA team lambasted in RISKS Digest

2010-03-05 Thread Sidney Markowitz
tp://old.nabble.com/SA-team-lambasted-in-RISKS-Digest-tp27789030p27799024.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SA team lambasted in RISKS Digest

2010-03-05 Thread jd
Justin Mason さんは書きました: > Agreed, he's clearly unaware of > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271 > > Anyone care to craft a response? I think we should. bonus points for > including the obligatory comp.risks tagline: > > "The RISK? Jumping to an invalid conclusion based o

Re: SA team lambasted in RISKS Digest

2010-03-05 Thread Justin Mason
Agreed, he's clearly unaware of https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6271 Anyone care to craft a response? I think we should. bonus points for including the obligatory comp.risks tagline: "The RISK? Jumping to an invalid conclusion based on incomplete research." ;) --j. 20

Re: SA team lambasted in RISKS Digest

2010-03-04 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:45 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/25.94.html#subj11 > I suggest someone send RISKS a clarification if indeed the issue is resolved. I suggest the author checks the facts. The following quote, the beginning of that, err... text, is utter

SA team lambasted in RISKS Digest

2010-03-04 Thread jidanni
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/25.94.html#subj11 I suggest someone send RISKS a clarification if indeed the issue is resolved.