> But anyway, if one has good ideas how to integrate a result from a
previous test into a local test, I will be happy to hear about it.
In 3.0+ you can use full to find previous SA headers in the mail, and then
write rules against their presence. In some rare cases this could be useful
I suppose.
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, April 2, 2005, 2:43:14 AM, you wrote:
TS> Two hints: one ist that the name of the host which added the SPAM info
TS> to the header ist not mine but the hoster´s. The second is that I
TS> rewrite the subject and put the original mail in an attachment while
TS> the mails I
At 03:34 AM 4/2/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously my SA skips messages wich are already marked.
Can I switch this "skip" off?
SA itself doesn't "skip" messages that are already marked. Period.
You'll have to look at the configuration you're using to call SA, as the
only way to "skip" messag
Thanks!
I was wrong, sorry
My "spamd" was down, not checking anything.
But anyway, if one has good ideas how to integrate a result from a previous
test into a local test, I will be happy to hear about it.
thx & cheers
Thomas
__
Mit WEB.
Is it possible you have procmail set up to check for X-Spam-Status: Yes in
the incoming mail and bypass SA? Some people do this sort of thing. (But
you don't want to bypass on a status of No, of course.)
Loren
>
> > Obviously my SA skips messages wich are already marked.
>
> What makes you think this?
>
> So far as I know, SA strips (most) previous SA headers from
> the mail, then processes it. So you may or may not get the
> same results the second time.
>
> Loren
>
Two hints: one ist th
> Obviously my SA skips messages wich are already marked.
What makes you think this?
So far as I know, SA strips (most) previous SA headers from the mail, then
processes it. So you may or may not get the same results the second time.
Loren
Hi,
I am running SA 3. on Linux with Postfix and Cyrus (invoked as content_filter
via PIPE in Postfix using spamd/spamc). In general SA is workig fine.
Now I saw that some messages are already marked by my mailbox provider. For
some reasons I want my SA to work on these messages again (one is to
