dy is indeed
>> scanned, as
>> it catched the testphrase just fine, but why not the porn stuff?
>
> which porn stuff? your first URL is a gtube test and the second doesn't
> contain any message that we can look at.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
htt
patrickbaer wrote:
Good morning,
I have setup a test-installation of SA, fetching emails from my imap server
and parsing it through SA.
It works so far, yet I have noticed it does only scan for things like
invalid headers, RBL MX, invalid return adress and so on. But when I send
myself a test m
patrickbaer wrote:
PS: I have made some other tests and it seems, the body is indeed scanned, as
it catched the testphrase just fine, but why not the porn stuff?
which porn stuff? your first URL is a gtube test and the second doesn't
contain any message that we can look at.
PS: I have made some other tests and it seems, the body is indeed scanned, as
it catched the testphrase just fine, but why not the porn stuff?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SA-does-not-apply-content-filter-rules-tp19253738p19254301.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin
://www.nabble.com/file/p19253738/testlauf.cli.txt
testlauf.cli.txt
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19253738/testlauf.cli3.txt testlauf.cli3.txt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SA-does-not-apply-content-filter-rules-tp19253738p19253738.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing
