Re: SA and MTA message filtering

2006-08-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, August 18, 2006 11:17 AM -0400 Sanford Whiteman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Three out of your four objectives are markedly off-topic: there's no reason for SA to ever see mail for unknown local recipients. Those messages should be rejected by the MTA, using either your text fi

RE: SA and MTA message filtering

2006-08-18 Thread Ben Story
rcin Wasilewski; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SA and MTA message filtering > 1) if message is marked as SPAM and mail address doesn't exist - > delete it or move to a local folder on SA_MACHINE, > 3) if message is not marked as SPAM and mail address exist - pass it

Re: SA and MTA message filtering

2006-08-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> 1) if message is marked as SPAM and mail address doesn't exist - delete it > or move to a local folder on SA_MACHINE, > 3) if message is not marked as SPAM and mail address exist - pass it to the > Exchange mail server, > 4) if message is not marked as SPAM and mail address doesn't exist - pass

SA and MTA message filtering

2006-08-17 Thread o2 - Marcin Wasilewski
Hello, I need some help with SA 3.1. and MTA configuration (Exim or Postfix). My actual configuration looks like this: Inet --> SPAM_ASSASSIN_MACHINE --> Mail Server (Exchange). SPAM_ASSASSIN_MACHINE is running Debian with SPAM Proxy Daemon (SpamAssassin Proxy) which check mail for spam and the