Re: SA, MS, RBL problem

Further question, Since the *combined.njabl.org*: dnsbl.njabl.org and dynablock.njabl.org in a single zone is what you get and : With the advent of Spamhaus's PBL (http://spamhaus.org/pbl/), dynablock.njabl.org has become obsolete. Rather than maintain separate similar DNSBL zones, NJA

Re: SA, MS, RBL problem

Problem solved, I had to forward combined.njabl.org in named conf on the cachers... duh! THANKS! Vasiliy Boulytchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote: Excellent, Now we are in the right direction. Now. I use the NJABL-provided rsync syntax to sync... $ cat /usr/local/bi

Re: SA, MS, RBL problem

Excellent, Now we are in the right direction. Now. I use the NJABL-provided rsync syntax to sync... $ cat /usr/local/bin/njablrsync #!/bin/sh rsync -vaL rsync.njabl.org::njabl/rbldnsd/ /var/dnsbl/njabl/ which provides me with: ls /var/lib/rbldns/work/ bhnc.gz dnsbl.n

Re: SA, MS, RBL problem

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote: > be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see [...] > Can someone please help me setup NJABL properly? I am invoking SA via > MS... as you can see below, SA does seem to check NJABL... [...] > [15101] db

Re: SA, MS, RBL problem

Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote: > GENTS! > > I have setup rbldnsd daemon, and am rsyncing down from NJABL... > > I have made the local DNS cachers forward queries to rbldnsd. That can > be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see > that query get forwarded to rbldnsd, and i see

SA, MS, RBL problem

GENTS! I have setup rbldnsd daemon, and am rsyncing down from NJABL... I have made the local DNS cachers forward queries to rbldnsd. That can be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see that query get forwarded to rbldnsd, and i see the query in the log so i know 100