For the SARE rules you only need to use ONE of sa-update or
rules_du_jour. Either works fine. sa-update has the potential to get
you newer rules faster without any significant additional load on the
servers serving the channels.
Assuming you want to use sa-update for everything...
- remove
Hi all,
I followed the 2 docs here : http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm and
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
But i'm not sure all is ok because link for "more info" is broken..and i'm
really a newbie ;-((
My /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt :
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 01:41 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>
> > rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> > doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> > (without the quotes, of course) " && /et
On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> (without the quotes, of course) " && /etc/init.d/amavis reload" to the
> command line? Or is there another
On 29-okt-2006, at 17:55, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the
openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil ge
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil get you a spam detection rate >99%.
I'm doing all that, now, I th
On 29-okt-2006, at 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get
the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://
saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates the necessity to run
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:33:54 -0400, "Shaun T. Erickson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get the SARE
>> rulesets from the channel provided by http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
>
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates the necessity to run rulesdujour alongside sa-update. This
channel consists onl
On 29-okt-2006, at 7:38, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does ever
Many of them are SARE rulesets. Look at www.rulesemporium.com/rules to see
the descriptions of the various rulesets. No, not all of them are "safe".
Many of them are deliberately graded by your willingness to live with
possible FPs. In general they range from xxx0.cf for "dead safe" to xxx4 o
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does everyone use all of them? How do you
decide which to use
12 matches
Mail list logo
