On 2/26/2016 9:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:44 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
On 2/26/2016 9:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
Restored a backup yesterday to get the 72_active.cf file back. Rule
updates from the saupdate run at about midnight
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:44 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
On 2/26/2016 9:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
Restored a backup yesterday to get the 72_active.cf file back. Rule
updates from the saupdate run at about midnight updated everything and I
don't see any 0-le
On 2/26/2016 9:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
Hmmm, well, I guess a big enough problem won't fail lint:
bigsky:spamassassin root# ls -l
3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 0 Feb 25 04:29
3.004001/updates_spamass
Am 26.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
Hmmm, well, I guess a big enough problem won't fail lint:
bigsky:spamassassin root# ls -l
3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 0 Feb 25 04:29
3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
That's what backups ar
On 2/25/2016 12:33 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe'
lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY,
Am 25.02.2016 um 19:25 schrieb John Hardin:
If that's indeed the cause, I'm surprised that masscheck proceeded
in the
face of a failed lint and that an error in one standalone rule
affected a
bunch of totally unrelated rules...
Hmmm, well, I guess a big enough problem won't fail lint:
big
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
> I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
> today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines
> (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_H
On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:42, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not
today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe'
lines (e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in
72_active.cf.
