On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, SM wrote:
At 18:23 19-07-2007, David B Funk wrote:
You can control the order that milers are run but IIRC, each milter
gets a copy of the -original- input message before any local
modifications are done. So the final message will have the headers
added by each milter but
At 18:23 19-07-2007, David B Funk wrote:
You can control the order that milers are run but IIRC, each milter
gets a copy of the -original- input message before any local
modifications are done. So the final message will have the headers
added by each milter but neither milter will see the other's
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using milter-p0f to add a "X-milter-p0f-Report:" to emails. Email are
> passed via spamassass-milter to spamd. I've written some rules, that I
> thought would catch things in the headers with spamd, but unfortunately they
> don't appear t
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 14:30
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Rule not firing in spamd
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 14:05
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 14:05
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rule not firing in spamd
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:05:43PM -0500, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
> &g
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:05:43PM -0500, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
> When running spamd I get:
> tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,U
> NPARSEABLE_RELAY
>
> With spamassassin -D:
> tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,JD_SPACES_KEYWORD
Hi,
I'm using milter-p0f to add a "X-milter-p0f-Report:" to emails. Email are
passed via spamassass-milter to spamd. I've written some rules, that I
thought would catch things in the headers with spamd, but unfortunately they
don't appear to work with spamd, but spamassassin -D < msg shows that th
