At 01:34 PM 11/10/2006 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
ha, as if it were even a rant! Anything that is multipart but has no
text/plain should be rejected by the MTA so that the ISP's get round
to fixing the problem. Flood an SMTP with bounces because of that and
all of a sudden the problem gets addre
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Steve Lake wrote:
> End users want eye candy and the "ooo's and hhh's" treatment
> when reading mail. To them email isn't a tool, but an
> entertainment form.
Snarf!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholi
Am 10.11.2006 um 07:11 schrieb Steve Lake:
At 07:05 PM 11/8/2006 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
My manufacturing company is very picky about accepting physical
inputs from vendors. We should be equally picky about what we
accept from them in email.
Oh, I'll fully agree with that. T
At 07:05 PM 11/8/2006 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
My manufacturing company is very picky about accepting physical inputs
from vendors. We should be equally picky about what we accept from them in
email.
Oh, I'll fully agree with that. The problem isn't doing it the
right way. The p
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:06 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rule for raw HTML
>
> My manufacturing company is very picky about accepting
> physical in
--On Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:21 AM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really dislike html in mails - whether in the right mime part or not -
but I have seen many legitimate mails that get mime stuff wrong. Of
course these are not normal mail clients, but server generated mails like
order con
>> A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as
>> normal text (due to them not getting something right).
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> and you may havecontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the
>> length of his second speech, and at the end of it heand the
>> mortification o
Am 09.11.2006 um 01:18 schrieb Ron:
A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as
normal text (due to them not getting something right).
For example:
and you may havecontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the
length of his second speech, and at the end of it heand the
A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as
normal text (due to them not getting something right).
For example:
and you may havecontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the
length of his second speech, and at the end of it heand the
mortification of kitty
Is there a rul
