-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-02-16 18:20, @lbutlr wrote:
> So it seems that no one uses spamassassin -d to remove markup for
> spam messages reclassified as ham?
>
> OK, I can work with that.
>
> The trouble with using formail/procmail is that the "mailbox
> timestamp" f
So it seems that no one uses spamassassin -d to remove markup for spam messages
reclassified as ham?
OK, I can work with that.
The trouble with using formail/procmail is that the "mailbox timestamp" for the
message will change, but i’ll cobble together a procmailrc to feed to formail
and see h
Am 02.02.2016 um 17:46 schrieb @lbutlr:
That’s interesting, but what the user means by “spam tagging” is the subject
tagging and the message attachment
with a sane configuration it would not be a attachment but headers
eaisly to strip with "formail" and replace the subject-tagging should be
On Tue Feb 02 2016 09:36:12 Martin Gregorie said:
>
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 09:10 -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
>> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user
>> would like it if the tagging of the message was
Am 02.02.2016 um 17:33 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:19, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
@lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
like it if the tagging of the
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 09:10 -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user
> would like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the
> process.
>
I do something similar when I add
On 02 Feb 2016, at 09:19, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> @lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
>> When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
>> have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
>> like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the process
@lbutlr kirjoitti 2.2.2016 18:10:
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i
have a script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would
like it if the tagging of the message was removed in the process.
spamassassin -d doesn’t seem the right tool since I think
When a user moves a message from the spam box to the not spam box i have a
script that learns that message as ham, however, the user would like it if the
tagging of the message was removed in the process.
spamassassin -d doesn’t seem the right tool since I think I need to write the
unmarked-up
