Re: Removing SA headers

2005-04-13 Thread .rp
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:51, Matt Kettler wrote: > No, you can use a procmail rule to funnel the non-spam messages into > spamassassin -d, which will remove the markup. > Thank you, that is what I did, :0fw:clearSA.lck * ^X-Spam-Status: No | spamassassin -d

Re: Removing SA headers

2005-04-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Mike Jackson wrote: > > As written, the rule would try to lock the spamassassin program, which > might cause weird issues, and since it doesn't include the 'c' option > it would simply throw away the message after removing the headers. > Thanks for the catch Mike. It's the details of what :0: vs :

Re: Removing SA headers

2005-04-12 Thread Mike Jackson
Something like this inserted after your main call to SA: :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: No | spamassassin -d Change the first line from: :0: to: :0fc As written, the rule would try to lock the spamassassin program, which might cause weird issues, and since it doesn't include the 'c' option it would simply

Re: Removing SA headers

2005-04-12 Thread Matt Kettler
.rp wrote: >SA 2.64 >sendmail 8.13 >procmail > >SA is being called in the system wide procmail and not as a milter. >I would like to strip the SA X- headers for those emails that are not >considered spam. Is formail the only way to do this? > > > No, you can use a procmail rule to funnel the

Re: Removing SA headers

2005-04-12 Thread Andy Jezierski
".rp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/12/2005 12:28:29 PM: > SA 2.64 > sendmail 8.13 > procmail > > SA is being called in the system wide procmail and not as a milter. > I would like to strip the SA X- headers for those emails that are not > considered spam. Is formail the only way to do this?

Removing SA headers

2005-04-12 Thread .rp
SA 2.64 sendmail 8.13 procmail SA is being called in the system wide procmail and not as a milter. I would like to strip the SA X- headers for those emails that are not considered spam. Is formail the only way to do this?