On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 08:44 -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> Our scan time use to be much longer and it was because of clamav. I realized
> that I was scanning with clamscan and not clamdscan.
>
> The clamdscan uses the daemon that's already loaded, so it's not loading the
> virus database everytime
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 02:05 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 22 April 2010 00:44, Chris wrote:
> > I've posted two files below, one is the time output
> for a spam
> > and one
> > for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan
> times have
> > bec
On tor 22 apr 2010 04:21:40 CEST, Chris wrote
Clam was running really slow and sucking a bunch of memory however, the
problem there was found to be that I had a mail.cvd and main.cld db, I
removed the .cld file and it seemed to speed up somewhat.
this one is really a design bug in clamav when v
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 02:05 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
>
>
> On 22 April 2010 00:44, Chris wrote:
> I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam
> and one
> for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have
> become
> slow
On 22 April 2010 00:44, Chris wrote:
> I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam and one
> for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have become
> slower and slower. For instance stats from last night below. Anyone with
> any ideas on how to speed things up?
>
Chris,
Do you use sa-compile? I found that made a tremendous difference for me.
-lee
Chris wrote:
> I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam and one
> for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have become
> slower and slower. For instance stats from last nig
I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam and one
for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have become
slower and slower. For instance stats from last night below. Anyone with
any ideas on how to speed things up?
Email:62 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: -16.9
