2015-03-17 22:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I am working on recommendations for the ASF to modernize the
installation of SA for the foundation.
We have some givens:
Using Ubuntu
Using Postfix
Need to stick with maintainable packages
Likely needs to stay away from lots of tweaks and heavy customi
please stay on list
Am 18.03.2015 um 10:46 schrieb Anthony Cartmell:
no, we have per day 300 SA rejects and had 20 clamav hits before change
the order, now the SA reject-count is not much different and only 5
clamav hits per day
I was just reporting that MailScanner had changed its order of sc
Am 18.03.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Anthony Cartmell:
reverse the order in "smtpd_milters" but keep in mind that a well
trained SA rejetcs much more mails than clamav and while clamav needs
less ressources you by-pass the whole virus canner that way
MailScanner used to scan in that order too, SA th
On 03/17/2015 10:16 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hello All,
I am working on recommendations for the ASF to modernize the
installation of SA for the foundation.
We have some givens:
Using Ubuntu
Using Postfix
Need to stick with maintainable packages
Likely needs to stay away from lots of tweaks
Am 17.03.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
So I'd like any input you might have, on or off list. Here's some
questions I believe will help guide things:
Q1 - What is the best glue for SA for Postfix that does the following:
- can implement clamav before SA call
postfix does that out-o
Hello All,
I am working on recommendations for the ASF to modernize the
installation of SA for the foundation.
We have some givens:
Using Ubuntu
Using Postfix
Need to stick with maintainable packages
Likely needs to stay away from lots of tweaks and heavy customization
such as using MIMEDefa
