On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: MySQL Student
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:47 -0400
> Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
> don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
> (cut down) configuration and all data bas
From: MySQL Student
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:47 -0400
> Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
> don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
> (cut down) configuration and all data base accesses and UBL calls etc
>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:03:16 +0100
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> gawk '
> BEGIN { act = "copy" }
> /^X-Spam/ { act = "skip" }
> /^[A-WYZ]/ { act = "copy" }
> {
>
Hi,
> Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By local, I mean
> don't use your main production SA - run a separate copy with its own
> (cut down) configuration and all data base accesses and UBL calls etc
> turned off.
Much better idea, thanks. Thanks for the script, too.
Best,
Al
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 23:18 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> How can I tell when another process is using the database and when it
> is free for my script to use?
>
> Is there a faster way to run spamassassin just to strip the SA headers?
>
Try using a local SA setup for stripping the headers. By lo
On Tuesday September 22 2009 06:32:12 Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On man 21 sep 2009 20:33:57 CEST, MySQL Student wrote
> >> but this will invalidtate dkim headers if this headers
> >> is signed, are spamassassin aware of this problem ? (in general)
> >
> > Are you saying there is a bug?
>
> partly ye
On man 21 sep 2009 20:33:57 CEST, MySQL Student wrote
but this will invalidtate dkim headers if this headers
is signed, are spamassassin aware of this problem ? (in general)
Are you saying there is a bug?
partly yes, its not a bug as long you keep the orginal email
but spamassassin --mbox < i
Hi,
It's certainly not a fast operation, but using the following will
split an mbox into individual messages:
export FILENO=0
mkdir msgs
formail -s sh -c 'cat - >msgs/$FILENO' < mbox-name.mbox
I also created a loop that would strip all the SA headers from the messages:
for file in *; do ech
Hi,
> IIRC you previously mentioned using Pine. Just in case you're not aware
> the default format for Pine/Alpine is MBX, an extended version of
> MBOX. You can tell the difference because MBX mailboxes start with a
> dummy email that's hidden by the software.
It seems that if you save messages
> but this will invalidtate dkim headers if this headers is signed, are
> spamassassin aware of this problem ? (in general)
Are you saying there is a bug?
> mutt -f mbox
>
> in mutt save to another folder if missclassified
Yes, I use pine for that, but would like to eliminate as many of the
FNs
Hi,
>> Thank you all for your help. The "mbox split" suggestion is a good
>> one. I'll follow that route and post my experience later.
>
> formail -s is the way to go.
I thought about that as a component of procmail. Sounds great.
Thanks,
Alex
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:15:14 -0400
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
> The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
> SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
> URLs in them that
On man 21 sep 2009 04:47:23 CEST, MySQL Student wrote
Wait, my mistake. I read that too fast. Does that work, and rewrite
the X-Spam-Status header?
imho spamassassin always remove its own known headers, but only once
it can add self so yes the trick is to retest, where you will see if
its
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
>> > for research reasons?
>>
>> That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
>> train bayes.
>>
>
>> Yeah, that's kind of what I thought. Maybe a program that can split
>> each me
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> You probably want "spamassassin --mbox". :)
> It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
> "spamassassin --mbox infile > outfile".
>
> If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
>
Yes, but he's got mixed spam and nonspam in
On Sep 20, 2009, at 20:45, MySQL Student wrote:
Thank you all for your help. The "mbox split" suggestion is a good
one. I'll follow that route and post my experience later.
formail -s is the way to go.
Hi,
>> You probably want "spamassassin --mbox". :)
>> It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
>> "spamassassin --mbox infile > outfile".
>
> My apologies if it wasn't clear, but these messages have already been
Wait, my mistake. I read that too fast. Does that work, a
Hi,
> You probably want "spamassassin --mbox". :)
> It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
> "spamassassin --mbox infile > outfile".
My apologies if it wasn't clear, but these messages have already been
marked by SA. Some are ham, and the rest are FPs that I'd like t
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
>> for research reasons?
>>
>
> That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
> train bayes.
>
>
>> There's no way to (directly) get SA to modify email that's
You probably want "spamassassin --mbox". :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
"spamassassin --mbox infile > outfile".
If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:46 PM, MySQL Student wrote:
> Yeah, that's kind of w
Hi,
> Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
> for research reasons?
That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
train bayes.
> There's no way to (directly) get SA to modify email that's already in an
> mbox file. The mass-check and sa-le
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
> The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
> SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
> URLs in them that weren't on the blacklist at the time t
Hi,
I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
URLs in them that weren't on the blacklist at the time they were
received?
Must I break
23 matches
Mail list logo
