>Make sure that the directories
>listed in your error logs are owned by the hula user. Some early versions
>of HULA had problems with SA integration what version of HULA are you
>using?
Using hula r1201. I use to have SA 3.1.0 installed and working with hula
r1201. Then i tried to upgrade to SA 3.
Okay I did not realize you were using HULA so forget the postfix
questions.If I remember correctly HULA calls SA as the HULA user, its
been some time since I played with HULA. Make sure that the directories
listed in your error logs are owned by the hula user. Some early versions
of HULA had
> Could you please let me know how you call spamd, I am taking it that you
> do this via postfix master.cf and are not running amavis. What user does
> spamd run as?
Err, not exactly sure how to answer this. I just install SA, configure
the local.cf and start spamd. We use hula which is a netmail
>>If you build the tarball you will have a spamassassin rpm and a
> perl-Mail-spamassassin rpm.
> This is correct; i have a perl-mail-spamassassin rpm
>
>>I might be behind where you are in the process, but first try this
>
>>1) Stop postifx, amavis, and spamassassin
>>) Using Yast unistall all the
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wow! I have installed from source, i have installed from rpm and i
> have found out that installing from cpan does not work with
> suse/SLES9.
Hrm. Sorry, I forgot that SLES is RPM-based as well.
I've been doing this successfully with Fedora, but I'v
>If you build the tarball you will have a spamassassin rpm and a
perl-Mail-spamassassin rpm.
This is correct; i have a perl-mail-spamassassin rpm
>I might be behind where you are in the process, but first try this
>1) Stop postifx, amavis, and spamassassin
>) Using Yast unistall all the spamassas
On SLES the problem I believe you are having is the difference in what the
Yast scripts are looking for and the installs you have made using the rpms
built from SA's tarball. If you build the tarball you will have a
spamassassin rpm and a perl-Mail-spamassassin rpm. Yast will look for a
perl-spam
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I downloaded the traball and made a rpm; which created
>> perl-spamassassin.rpm and mail-spamassassin.rpm. I installed
>> perl-spamassassin first using yast and then spamassassin using
>> yast. The spamassassin rpm failed to
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the traball and made a rpm; which created
> perl-spamassassin.rpm and mail-spamassassin.rpm. I installed
> perl-spamassassin first using yast and then spamassassin using
> yast. The spamassassin rpm failed to installed but when i do a rpm
>> Well, i may have really messed up now. I uninstalled all spamassassin
>> 3.1 using red carpet and the installed perl-spamassassin from rpm
>> usingyast (this was fine). Then i tried to install spamassassin 3.2
>> from rpm
>> using yast, this gives this error:
>> ERROR(InstTarget:E_RpmDB_subproce
> Well, i may have really messed up now. I uninstalled all spamassassin
> 3.1 using red carpet and the installed perl-spamassassin from rpm
> usingyast (this was fine). Then i tried to install spamassassin 3.2
> from rpm
> using yast, this gives this error:
> ERROR(InstTarget:E_RpmDB_subprocess_f
Well, i may have really messed up now. I uninstalled all spamassassin
3.1 using red carpet and the installed perl-spamassassin from rpm using
yast (this was fine). Then i tried to install spamassassin 3.2 from rpm
using yast, this gives this error:
ERROR(InstTarget:E_RpmDB_subprocess_failed)
---
er
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>> "perl-spamassassin" sounds like a package. Don't mix using CPAN and
using
>>> packages. If you're using a package, upgrade SA through a package.
>>> If you want to use CPAN, get rid of the packag
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> "perl-spamassassin" sounds like a package. Don't mix using CPAN and
>> using
>> packages. If you're using a package, upgrade SA through a package.
> If you
>> want to use CPAN, get rid of the packages first.
>>
> I did install from rpm. So, if i understand you right, i
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > "perl-spamassassin" sounds like a package. Don't mix using CPAN and using
> > packages. If you're using a package, upgrade SA through a package.
> > If you want to use CPAN, get rid of the packages first.
>
> I did install
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> "perl-spamassassin" sounds like a package. Don't mix using CPAN and using
> packages. If you're using a package, upgrade SA through a package.
If you
> want to use CPAN, get rid of the packages first.
>
I did install from rpm. So, if i understand you right, i need to
uni
16 matches
Mail list logo
