rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
>> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>> >>
>> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
> >>
> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
> >>
> >> Alex
> >
> > NO NO NO NO NO
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
>> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>
>> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
>>
>> Alex
>
> NO NO NO NO NO!
> Drop has the effect of tarpitting them :-)
Not quite, tarpitting is
Hi,
> not relevant to Spamassassin, is it?
>
> if you have to go way off topic at pleas be considerat and add an OT: tag to
> the subject.. > /dev/null
>
> or try: http://spam-l.com/mailman/listinfo
Yes, very much OT. I was following along with the other iptables comments.
Thanks for the point
On 11/25/2009 11:29 PM, Alex wrote:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP and enjoy the silence :-)
Trouble is that you have to be the one that drives to the colo to
eventually undo the rul
>> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>
> Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP and enjoy the silence :-)
Trouble is that you have to be the one that drives to the colo to
eventually undo the rules :-)
Speaking of fw rules, h
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
>
> Alex
NO NO NO NO NO!
Drop has the effect of tarpitting them :-) As the Supremes sang;
"Set me free why don't you baby? You just k
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 19:20 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
> > Any more ranges most welcome :-)
>
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:49 PM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>
> umm side note, i spose to Tara...
>
> is Constant Contact like the default email marketing system (or one of
> them)
> for salesforce.com or whatever other large "online" customer management
> software??? or do you own them or they own you or
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
Alex
>
> uri LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT m{constantcontact\.com\b}
> score LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT 12
> describe LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT contains link to
> constant contact [dot] com
>
thanks Ned,
i do have a coupla companies that use CC for email so i wont totally whack.
they
thanks Tara, not the hugest biggie...
yet since we are only on a few select lists and use this email address, i
figured several others on this list were getting it too
i did forward both to abuse at your site with headers
happy gobble gobble everyone!
- rh
I've got Compliance on it alre
On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
Any more ranges most welcome :-)
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
--
xpoint
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 17:34 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> >> R-Elists wrote:
> >>>
> >>> on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good
> >>> handle
> >>> on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Const
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
R-Elists wrote:
on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good
handle
on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Constant please share your SA
info
on that please?
Here's mine:
uri LOCAL
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> R-Elists wrote:
>>
>> just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on
>> our
>> "email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
>>
>> obviously trolling for email addresses
>>
>> would the Constant Contact
R-Elists wrote:
just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
"email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
obviously trolling for email addresses
would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate on this list please kick
some hiney after you ar
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:53 AM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>
> just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
> "email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
>
> obviously trolling for email addresses
>
> would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate o
On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> R-Elists wrote:
>> on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good handle
>> on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Constant please share your SA info
>> on that please?
>>
> header CONSTANTCONTACT List-Unsubscribe
R-Elists wrote:
just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
"email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
obviously trolling for email addresses
would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate on this list please kick
some hiney after you are
20 matches
Mail list logo
