Hi Kevin,
Everything got back to normal! Thank you for fixing it :-)
18/07/2020-06:03:01
Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org
config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
USER_IN_WELCOMELIST_TO
channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed
Update failed, e
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-18 23:32:
Great, thanks for the update. With this change we also know how to
best prevent similar issues.
more nutella :=)
Great, thanks for the update. With this change we also know how to best
prevent similar issues.
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Marc
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2020, 17:43 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> Agreed. 1879851 is after I submitted the fix but doesn;t include the
> fix. I will have to check again after the next rule publishing.
> Sorry for the false alarm.
Feedback: sa-update without errors now. Thanks a lot!
Cheer
Are you using 3.4.2 or older?
And these were tested but the warnings only affect older versions.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:54 AM Reindl Harald
wro
Thanks. The fix is long since submitted with the rules but rule
publishing is not including it. I have asked two other PMC members to
take a look!
On 7/17/2020 7:55 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
>
> Ok. 1879934.tar.gz has been published on sa-update.bitwell.fi as I can
> download it with wget.
>
> So
Is there a mandatory update path that sa-update observes to reach the
last update? Like it has to go through all updates to reach the last
one? That would explain why it's still trying to install 1879882.tar.gz
instead of 1879934.tar.gz
I know I can work around this with --install, but since y
Ok. 1879934.tar.gz has been published on sa-update.bitwell.fi as I can
download it with wget.
So I've changed
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY to
only use this particular mirror, but sa-update still downloads
1879882.tar.gz instead of 1879934.tar.gz.
Here
Sorry I meant "I'll let you know when I get 1879934".
juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre files
succeeded, continuing with channel updates
juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg: channel: MIRRORED.BY file is too old,
forcing refresh
juil. 17 13:15:21.107 [21396] dbg:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for taking care. I believe I'm still getting 1879434 (or maybe
1879882?) as per the debug log below:
juil. 17 11:55:27.015 [9424] dbg: gpg: release trusted key id list:
5E541DC959CB8BAC7C78DFDC4056A61A5244EC45
26C900A46DD40CD5AD24F6D7DEE01987265FA05B
0C2B1D7175B852C64B3CDC7
Agreed. 1879851 is after I submitted the fix but doesn;t include the fix.
I will have to check again after the next rule publishing. Sorry for the
false alarm.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail -
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2020, 08:11 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> Just an update that this is fixed:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7840
>
> Should be a rule update published in the next 48 hours with the fix.
> Feedback welcome because we are making fixes for older ve
Frederic, I believe ruleset 1879934 has been published and should fix the
issue. Can you confirm, please?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:01 AM Kevin A.
--On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 9:59 AM -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail"
wrote:
I'm sure someone has produced an RPM for CentOS 6 for 3.4.4 by
now.
I'm using John Hardin's recommendation from his 2020-02-07 post and it's
working fine on CentOS 7:
You can download the original (as well as later ver
On 7/15/2020 8:33 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
> Thank you for your quick and enlightening response! I've seen your
> other post today about rule update #1879885 that is to be realesed.
Thanks, Frederic. I hope that fix will resolve your issue as well. I
believe they are one and the same, i.e. a lint
Kevin,
Thank you for your quick and enlightening response! I've seen your other post
today about rule update #1879885 that is to be realesed.
Thank you for fixing it for older SA versions (SA 3.3.1 is still the one in
CentOS/RHEL 6.10 supported until Nov. 30th).
Best regards,
Frédéric.
--
Just an update that this is fixed:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7840
Should be a rule update published in the next 48 hours with the fix.
Feedback welcome because we are making fixes for older versions so it's
harder to gauge if it's fixed without user feedback.
Regards,
On 7/15/2020 7:13 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> -
> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
> USER_IN_WELCOMELIST_TO
>
> Jul 15 13:10:33.621 [2458] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with
> code 4
> Update failed, exiting with code 4
> sa-update failed for unknown reasons
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2020, 07:08 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> If it is still not working, what error are you getting, please?
On 7/15/2020 6:59 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> > > Can you try now and lmk, please? I think the current ruleset is
> > > 1879881
> > > has it fixed and is published.
If it is still not working, what error are you getting, please?
On 7/15/2020 6:59 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
>> Can you try now and lmk, please? I think the current ruleset is
>> 1879881
>> has it fixed and is published.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
This isn't the issue. We haven't turned off the sha1 sigs (yet).
On 7/15/2020 7:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> it's described here and not expected to get fixed:
--
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
htt
On 15.07.20 12:29, Frédéric Nass wrote:
From: Frédéric Nass
To: kmcgr...@apache.org, users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: update fail
Hello Kevin,
I am not kevin, is that fine?
As of today July 15th, sa-update (3.3.1) is trying to install 1879817.tar.gz
and it's still failing to do so.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2020, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> The version for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is Spamassassin 2.4.2.
Sorry, Spamassassin 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 of course.
On 7/15/2020 6:29 AM, Frédéric Nass wrote:
> As of today July 15th, sa-update (3.3.1) is trying to install
> 1879817.tar.gz and it's still failing to do so.
Hi Frederic,
What's the error you are getting specifically?
> Can you tell us in which revision of the signatures this is expected
> to be
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2020, 06:26 -0400 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> Yeah, that's just a lint warning. A fix was committed but I had to
> work
> out a merge complaint on the rule system publishing this morning. I
> believe a
Yes, but it prevents the signatures from being updated!
> Can you try
Yeah, that's just a lint warning. A fix was committed but I had to work
out a merge complaint on the rule system publishing this morning. I
believe a
Can you try now and lmk, please? I think the current ruleset is 1879881
has it fixed and is published.
However SA 3.4.3+ will still install upda
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2020, 16:43 +0200 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> A. Schulze skrev den 2020-07-14 13:19:
>
> > I tried to place "meta USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO (USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO)"
> > in
> > $LOCAL_RULES_DIR/local.cf
> > But that failed, too.
>
> sorry then, my rule ensure that USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_
Yep, agreed. A fix has been committed on the 10th but it's got to go
through masscheck to get published which might take another few days.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Tue,
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-14 16:46:
We believe this problem is related to both a problem in the rules as
well as the outdated version of SA by the user. Sa-update on 3.4.3+
will install on a lint warning.
its a clear bug on its own
We believe this problem is related to both a problem in the rules as well
as the outdated version of SA by the user. Sa-update on 3.4.3+ will
install on a lint warning.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmc
A. Schulze skrev den 2020-07-14 13:19:
I tried to place "meta USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO (USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO)" in
$LOCAL_RULES_DIR/local.cf
But that failed, too.
sorry then, my rule ensure that USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO exists if
USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO exists aswell
if none of them exists you still ha
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-14 13:55:
It will get fixed when masscheck pushes out a new ruleset.
until this happen all can restore old ruleset from tarballs
please do not make this problem ever again
Ahh yes. So it's an older SpamAssassin install. Good call.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 08:04 Henrik K wrote:
>
> The lint failure was only changed to debug since 3.4.3.
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 04:59:51PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Thanks. Please see [1]
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssas
The lint failure was only changed to debug since 3.4.3.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 04:59:51PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Thanks. Please see [1]https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
> and this should be resolved. I'm surprised a warning caused a failure though.
> --
> Kevin
It will get fixed when masscheck pushes out a new ruleset.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 07:20 A. Schulze wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.07.20 um 23:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> > Marcus Schopen skrev den 2020-07-11 23:43:
> >> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
> >> USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO
> >
Am 11.07.20 um 23:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> Marcus Schopen skrev den 2020-07-11 23:43:
>> config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
>> USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO
>
> meta USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO (USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO)
Hello,
My SA hit the same update issue. It was unable to update t
Thanks. Please see https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
and this should be resolved. I'm surprised a warning caused a failure
though.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798
Marcus Schopen skrev den 2020-07-11 23:43:
config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO
meta USER_IN_ALLOWLIST_TO (USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO)
i have still some bricks of Ritter Sport chocolate :=)
38 matches
Mail list logo
