C. Bensend wrote:
Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
update
> Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
> updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
updates.spamassassin.org
so
On 8/19/10 7:49 AM, "C. Bensend" wrote:
>
>> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
>> and never will.
>>
>> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
>> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
>> SARE.
> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
> and never will.
>
> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
> SARE.
>
> Anybody hammering the rulesemporium with lwp/w
On 2010-08-18 14:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
BE sareful about SARE rules. They are often obsolete, have false positives
and meny of them are already incorporated in stock SA, and some have better
alternatives (uri blacklist vs. hardcode
On 17.08.10 10:06, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I found out the above when trying to use the following howto for SARE
> rule updates: http://www.topdog.za.net/configure_spamassassin.
>
> #
> r...@warpath:~# sa-update --import GPG.KEY
> gpg: keyblock resource `/etc/
LOL, yep, I am retarded. Thanks!
Any ideas on the sa-update question/concern?
Thanks,
Mark
On 08/17/2010 11:17 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:06:41 -0500
Mark Chaney wrote:
Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
exact same files with the same modified da
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:06 -0500, Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing something).
>
One could be a hard link s
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:06:41 -0500
Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing
> something).
> r...@warpath:~# ls -
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:06 -0500, Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing something).
> r...@warpath:~# ls -l /etc
10 matches
Mail list logo
