On 12/8/2012 8:30 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
FYI, see $SUBJ.
Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is
reasonable to use.
I plan to fix these both with the 3.4.0 release assuming we can update
our website when that's done. Bu
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
> FYI, see $SUBJ.
Just noticed I opened a bug about this nearly a year and a half ago:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6632
--
"Anarchy is based on the observation that since few are fit to rule
themselves, even fewer are fit to rule others." -E
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
>> > implies is reasonable to use.
>> >
>> > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
>> > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even
Per Jessen wrote:
> dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
> > implies is reasonable to use.
> >
> > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
> > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
>> FYI, see $SUBJ.
>
> Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
> implies is reasonable to use.
>
> I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
> spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even onc
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
> FYI, see $SUBJ.
Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is
reasonable to use.
I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
--
"We will be dead
