On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:49:08PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> I've been considering possible improvements to how we figure out what
> rules are effective.
>
> Currently we use the S/O ratio and hit-rate of each individual rule, in
> other words, if a rule hits a lot of spam, and little nonspam,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott A Crosby writes:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:49:08 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
>
> > However, that doesn't take in account the situation where multiple rules
> > are hitting mostly the same mail; for example, like this:
> >
> >
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:49:08 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> However, that doesn't take in account the situation where multiple rules
> are hitting mostly the same mail; for example, like this:
>
> S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5
> RULE1: x x x x
Justin Mason wrote:
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5
RULE1: x x x x
RULE2: x x x x
RULE3: x x x
RULE4: x
(S1-S5 = 5 spam mails; H1-H5
