Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-08 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
Sorry, yes I should have been clearer there, it's from my /var/log/ mail.log which also logs pop and imap logins, spamd scanning details etc. FWIW I have lowered my scanning on message size limit in exim config file to 80k, and am not seeing these happening any more, however while it might

RE: spamd and exim

2005-08-07 Thread Herb Martin
> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Further to this, watching the mail.log, see this at the same > time as the cannot pass output in exim_main.log; > > Aug 8 15:33:17 (namehere) spamd[335]: bad protocol: header error: > (Content-Length mismatch: E

Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-07 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
Further to this, watching the mail.log, see this at the same time as the cannot pass output in exim_main.log; Aug 8 15:33:17 (namehere) spamd[335]: bad protocol: header error: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 151152 bytes, got 151161 bytes) So in fact is this the problem and not a zip fi

Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-04 Thread Loren Wilton
> For the devs, this is how Exim parses spamd's output. You guys see > anything odd about this? > > if( sscanf(CS spamd_buffer, > "SPAMD/%s 0 EX_OK\r\nContent-length: %*u\r\n\r\n%lf/%lf\r\n%n", > spamd_version,&spamd_score,&spamd_threshold, > &spamd_report_offset) != 3 ) { >/* try to fal

Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-04 Thread Steven Dickenson
Herb Martin wrote: 40-50 a day (over 9 days) for low volume mail server. Another server was primary MX until yesterday, and now I am picking off much of the junk before it even gets to SpamD. Ouch, that's a lot. It was so prevalent when I first switch this Exim server to primary that my thin

RE: spamd and exim

2005-08-03 Thread Herb Martin
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Dickenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Aug 3, 2005, at 9:52 PM, Herb Martin wrote: > > >> The message I am seeing in /var/log/exim_main.log is: > >> spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output > >> H=(mailservername) [IP] F= temporarily rejected aft

Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-03 Thread Steven Dickenson
On Aug 3, 2005, at 9:52 PM, Herb Martin wrote: The message I am seeing in /var/log/exim_main.log is: spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output H=(mailservername) [IP] F= temporarily rejected after DATA I am seeing a LOT of these but have been watching for them in the Panic Log as they are

RE: spamd and exim

2005-08-03 Thread Herb Martin
> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The message I am seeing in /var/log/exim_main.log is: > spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output > H=(mailservername) [IP] F= temporarily rejected after DATA I am seeing a LOT of these but have been watching fo

Re: spamd and exim

2005-08-03 Thread Steven Dickenson
On Aug 3, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Guthrie wrote: The message I am seeing in /var/log/exim_main.log is: spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output H=(mailservername) [IP] F= temporarily rejected after DATA This topic has come up a number of times on the Exim mailing list, but the answer