Matt Kettler writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Theo Van Dinter writes:
> >
> >> It depends on your SA version. It used to be 256k, but apparently 3.2
> >> upped it to 500k.
> >>
> >>> not be an issue. These messages are well below 256M. milter-spamc
> >>> only sends down the first 64K o
Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>
>>
>> It depends on your SA version. It used to be 256k, but apparently 3.2
>> upped it to 500k.
>>
>>
>>> not be an issue. These messages are well below 256M. milter-spamc
>>> only sends down the first 64K of the message in fact.
>>>
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 01:32:57AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > > > Anyone else seen this? Anyone have a fix?
> > > man spamd
> > > It's suggested to not send messages to spamd that are > 250K in size.
> >
> > Actually, it doesn't say this in the spamd man page at al
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 01:32:57AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > > Anyone else seen this? Anyone have a fix?
> > man spamd
> > It's suggested to not send messages to spamd that are > 250K in size.
>
> Actually, it doesn't say this in the spamd man page at all. However,
> spamc does have a limi
On Dec 21, 2007 5:13 PM, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > I'm running 3.2.3. I'm noticing that spamc/spamd fails when it's
> > presented large messages containing rather large mime attachments
>
> It doesn't fail in as
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> I'm running 3.2.3. I'm noticing that spamc/spamd fails when it's
> presented large messages containing rather large mime attachments
It doesn't fail in as much as it doesn't send it to spamd, as per its design.
> Anyone else seen t
Michael Grant wrote:
I'm running 3.2.3. I'm noticing that spamc/spamd fails when it's
presented large messages containing rather large mime attachments
(like more than a megabyte or so). When I run the messages through
spamc by hand, it returns immediately with a not-spam result with
headers li
> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:15 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: spamc/spamd failure
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michel Vanbreugel [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
