rg
Subject: RE: spamassassin working very poorly
Thanks guys, I just trained in 2089 legitimate ham messages, so hopefully that
will do the trick. And also thanks to you John, as I didn't even see that
URIBL_BLOCKED. I've setup a local recursion DNS server, which seems to have
taken c
On 10/8/2014 2:58 PM, Nick wrote:
Thanks Bowie, sure enough the actual spamd process was running as a different
user. The file to configure the user it runs under is
/etc/syscofnig/spamassassin
But it still should have used the bayes_path option from local.cf
regardless of the user. Unless
ailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:31 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin working very poorly
On 10/8/2014 2:13 PM, Nick wrote:
> In postfix, I'm calling spamassassin with the 2 lines:
> smtp inet n - n -
On 10/8/2014 2:13 PM, Nick wrote:
In postfix, I'm calling spamassassin with the 2 lines:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe flags=R user=spamd
argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/
sassin run as the spamd user? (It's CentOS
6.5) I've verified the Bayes database is good and populated for user spamd.
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On 10/8/2014 11:15 AM, Nick wrote:
I seem to be catching a lot more SPAM, but no matter what I try, it seems Bayes isn't getting
utilized. I have ~700 SPAMS and 2400 HAMS. When I run "spamassassin -D --lint" (as the
same user Postfix is running spamc as), it comes back with a report that seems
On 10/08/2014 05:15 PM, Nick wrote:
I seem to be catching a lot more SPAM, but no matter what I try, it
seems Bayes isn't getting utilized. I have ~700 SPAMS and 2400 HAMS.
When I run "spamassassin -D --lint" (as the same user Postfix is
running spamc as), it comes back with a report that seems t
pache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin working very poorly
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:36 schrieb andybalholm:
> On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Benny Pedersen-2 wrote:
>
> > So anti spammer would now stop reading here ? :)
>
> No, but I sometimes wonder if it’s wise to post my anti-spam ideas he
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:36 schrieb andybalholm:
On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Benny Pedersen-2 wrote:
> So anti spammer would now stop reading here ? :)
No, but I sometimes wonder if it’s wise to post my anti-spam ideas here,
since that makes it easier for spammers to work around them
a valid poi
On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Benny Pedersen-2 wrote:
> So anti spammer would now stop reading here ? :)
No, but I sometimes wonder if it’s wise to post my anti-spam ideas here, since
that makes it easier for spammers to work around them…
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.
On October 4, 2014 12:42:15 AM andybalholm wrote:
> Spammers also learn.
I'm pretty sure some of them read this list. (I sure would if I were a
spammer.)
So anti spammer would now stop reading here ? :)
> Spammers also learn.
I'm pretty sure some of them read this list. (I sure would if I were a
spammer.)
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/spamassassin-working-very-poorly-tp112068p112080.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Na
a positive impact on
things. I'll update after some time has gone by.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:17 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin working very poorly
Am 03.10.2014 u
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Nick wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
URIBL_BLOCKED = set up a local recursing (N
On 10/3/2014 3:07 PM, Nick wrote:
Over the last few months, spamassassin has begun barely working for me. SPAM is
so bad that I've actually started training it - which is something I've never
had to do in the past. So I've collected 370+ e-mails over the last few days,
and had sa-learn regular
Am 03.10.2014 um 21:07 schrieb Nick:
> Over the last few months, spamassassin has begun barely working for me
spammers also learn
> SPAM is so bad that I've actually started training it - which is something
> I've never had to do in the past. So I've collected 370+ e-mails over the
> last few
16 matches
Mail list logo
