Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:00:31PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > Is there any info on how to enable/disable/write my own rules?
>
> Yes. Enabling is simple, just have the rule in place. Disabling is simple,
> just set the score for the rule to 0. Wr
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
SpamAssassin comes with a whole bunch of rules by default.
The best thing is to look at those rules and see what they're
doing. There's probably real documentation somewhere, but
there is so much example code that you may not need it.
I did not see much
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
3. I did not clear explaination on how exactly the rbl_checks work. Can I
specify
which rbl to use and not use? I also could not find any information on which
connections to allow on the firewall to allow these checks. Our server is not
allowed
to make
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:00:31PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> Is there any info on how to enable/disable/write my own rules?
Yes. Enabling is simple, just have the rule in place. Disabling is simple,
just set the score for the rule to 0. Writing your own is a little harder...
If you do a "per
> > 3. I did not clear explaination on how exactly the rbl_checks work. Can I
> > specify
> >which rbl to use and not use? I also could not find any information on which
> >connections to allow on the firewall to allow these checks. Our server is
> >not allowed
> >to make any outgoing connecti
> SpamAssassin comes with a whole bunch of rules by default.
> The best thing is to look at those rules and see what they're
> doing. There's probably real documentation somewhere, but
> there is so much example code that you may not need it.
I did not see much in the local.cf after a fresh inst
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> I found the following which contains rules. http://bl.csma.biz/csma.cf
>
> From looking at these rules, it would seem that my server would
> query bl.csma.biz to see if the IP the email came from is on their
> list. Which means that I would have to allow
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:34:35PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> 1. From reading the docs I think using spamd and spamc (not spamassassin)
> would be the
> best. Is that what people in this group would recommend? Any reasons why not?
Generally speaking you want to use spamc/spamd instead of spamas
