Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
was I sayed before,
my problem was detected.. it a qmail-scanner-queue issue.. not
spamassin problem !
in addition, my bad English helped to get worse the things.
I use it program sufficient the time, but really I made confusion
involving qmail-scanner and I expre
was I sayed before,
my problem was detected.. it a qmail-scanner-queue issue.. not
spamassin problem !
in addition, my bad English helped to get worse the things.
I use it program sufficient the time, but really I made confusion
involving qmail-scanner and I expressed myself badly.
forg
Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas escreveu:
Why do you think it bypassed spamassassin? The whole fact the spam was
tagged means it did NOT bypass it, don't you think?
Because I received this email in my mailbox (and many others like this)
, so the spam was not blocked by sp
correct..
my problem have name:qmail-scanner-queue.pl
;o)
thanks !
Evan Platt escreveu:
Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
Because I received this email in my mailbox (and many others like
this) , so the spam was not blocked by spamassasin, although to
receive score 5.1 (required 5.0)
Spamassassi
Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
Because I received this email in my mailbox (and many others like
this) , so the spam was not blocked by spamassasin, although to
receive score 5.1 (required 5.0)
Spamassassin doesn't "block" mails. You will still see messages with
every score in your mailbox, unless y
maybe the problem is qmail-scanner and not spamassassin
my sa_quarantine_over is 0.1 (my $sa_quarantine_over='0.1';)
and qmail-scanner have a line like this:
if ($sa_quarantine_over > 0 && ($sa_score - $sa_required_hits) >=
$sa_quarantine_over) {
&debug("SA: seriously spammy - quarantine
Matus UHLAR - fantomas escreveu:
Why do you think it bypassed spamassassin? The whole fact the spam was
tagged means it did NOT bypass it, don't you think?
Because I received this email in my mailbox (and many others like this)
, so the spam was not blocked by spamassasin, although to re
Jason Esman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rejaine Monteiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:19 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spam bypass spamassassin
Why this spam scored with 5.1 (requered 5.0) bypass spamassassin??
(clamdscan: 0.93/
> -Original Message-
> From: Rejaine Monteiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:19 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: spam bypass spamassassin
>
>
> Why this spam scored with 5.1 (requered 5.0) bypass spamassassin??
>
> (clamdscan: 0.93/8144
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:18:53AM -0300, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
>
> Why this spam scored with 5.1 (requered 5.0) bypass spamassassin??
>
> (clamdscan: 0.93/8144. spamassassin: 3.2.5.
> Clear:RC:0(aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd):SA:1(5.1/5.0):.
> Processed in 2.490743 secs); 03 Sep 2008 11:32:21 -
> X-Spam-S
On 03.09.08 09:18, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
> Why this spam scored with 5.1 (requered 5.0) bypass spamassassin??
Why do you think it bypassed spamassassin? The whole fact the spam was
tagged means it did NOT bypass it, don't you think?
> (clamdscan: 0.93/8144. spamassassin: 3.2.5.
> Clear:RC:0(aaa
11 matches
Mail list logo
