> "Interestingly, the majority of energy usage (around 80%) comes from
users viewing and deleting spam, and searching for legitimate emails
within spam filters."
Right -- if your users can't trust their 'spam' folder as spam, then
what is the point? They should keep it around so they can che
--On Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:22 PM +0100 Martin Hepworth
wrote:
Interesting article
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16951-spam-tramples-environment-wit
h-huge-carbon-footprint.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news I wonder how
they figure out the transmission costs are are doing someth
I think this was Richi Jennings (http://richi.co.uk/) and McAfee.
maybe some MFE staff on the list might comment? ;)
--j.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 15:22, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Interesting
> article http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16951-spam-tramples-environment-with-huge-carbon-footprint
