On 2010-11-16 23:52, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:20 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
>>>
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
>>>
>>> I've never seen mail with so sh
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:20 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
> >
> >> 2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
> >
> > I've never seen mail with so short a body - where's the spam payload?
>
> Lik
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
I've never seen mail with so short a body - where's the spam payload?
Likely the Subject line.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
> Hello,
>
I've seen all but (2) in ham, so be careful with these rules - you
probably want to score them at 0.01 and use them in meta-rules.
> Just wanted to create (or use if they already exist) some rules:
> 1. Email body contains more than 10
