On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 14:57 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > Nope, spamd does not do anything with the email either.
>
> Thanks for correcting me. I use amavisd. For those who use spamd, how
> do they determine the email destiny based on the score? With just
> procmail?
Yes, or any other MDA, probably usin
Hi,
>> [...] spamassassin itself only does the scoring -- it's up to another
>> program, such as amavisd-new (separate application) or spamd (included
>> with spamassassin) to do something with the email once it has been
>> determined to be spam.
>
> Nope, spamd does not do anything with the email
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 21:34 -0400, Alex wrote:
> [...] spamassassin itself only does the scoring -- it's up to another
> program, such as amavisd-new (separate application) or spamd (included
> with spamassassin) to do something with the email once it has been
> determined to be spam.
Nope, spamd
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 18:22 -0700, bongomania wrote:
> My email server, squirrelmail, has spamassassin already installed. To
> configure, it says to enter the score above which emails should be
> quarantined. Unfortunately nowhere on that page, nor in the SA FAQ, nor in
> the SA WIKI, nor in a se
l usage
> notes and FAQ?
>
> Thanks for your help!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Searched-but-did-not-find-any-info-re-scores-for-squirrelmail-inbound-tp29008487p29008487.html
> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi,
> My email server, squirrelmail, has spamassassin already installed. To
Squirrelmail isn't your email server, it's a client to an email server
like postfix or sendmail.
> configure, it says to enter the score above which emails should be
> quarantined. Unfortunately nowhere on that page, n
!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Searched-but-did-not-find-any-info-re-scores-for-squirrelmail-inbound-tp29008487p29008487.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After another day of hacking, I have a handful of general questions
> that I hoped you could help me to answer.
>
> - How can I find the score of a particular rule, without having to use
> grep? I'm concerned that I might find it at some score, only for it to
> be red
Lars Ebeling wrote:
Dear All,
what does the different scores mean in this example:
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 1.332 0 1.558
the TFM is a good reading!
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
also available on the web:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
Search
On 28.08.08 13:34, Lars Ebeling wrote:
> what does the different scores mean in this example:
>
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 1.332 0 1.558
I think it's described in the documentation... have you read it?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#item_score_symbolic_
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 14:51 +0100, Alexis Manning wrote:
> > What are people getting for the following stock spam? Ones like this keep
> > scoring just under 5 for me.
>
> Same here, just under 5.0 and a lot...
>
> http://esmtp.webtent.net/clean-
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 14:51 +0100, Alexis Manning wrote:
> What are people getting for the following stock spam? Ones like this keep
> scoring just under 5 for me.
>
Same here, just under 5.0 and a lot...
http://esmtp.webtent.net/clean-ZGw0SdPapnBE
Anyone able to catch these?
--
Robert
At 10:23 PM 5/22/2007, Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
lately i'm getting a lot of spam with rather low scores under 12.0
meaning that trash is not automatically deleted by my sieve filter).
Here's a set of headers:
12 a low score?
12's pretty high.
8 is pretty high too,
The headers alone score
On Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 14:53 Matt Kettler wrote:
> I do agree.. it's not 100% safe.. However, it is also not safe to
> have a server with no RDNS, because many won't take your mail..
Yes, I just had configured a server today which happens to receive mail
from some Austrian government and h
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 22:51 Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> That said, you pretty much have to do this for your outbound
>> mailservers because several LARGE ISPs will not accept mail from
>> hosts with no RDNS. This includes AOL and Comcast off the top of my
>> head. If
On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 22:51 Matt Kettler wrote:
> That said, you pretty much have to do this for your outbound
> mailservers because several LARGE ISPs will not accept mail from
> hosts with no RDNS. This includes AOL and Comcast off the top of my
> head. If you want to be able to email users
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pablo Allietti wrote:
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no rever
From: "Pablo Allietti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find the
file that contain the scores i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
varia
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 16:09 Pablo Allietti wrote:
>> i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
>> give 3.0
>
> Don't do that, it's not required for a mail server to have an RDNS. At
> least, it used to be the last time I looked into the RFCs.
Technically, it's
On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 16:09 Pablo Allietti wrote:
> i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
> give 3.0
Don't do that, it's not required for a mail server to have an RDNS. At
least, it used to be the last time I looked into the RFCs.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc-
Pablo Allietti wrote:
>
> ok and i need to restart spamass after modify the local.cf?
Yes.
--
Bowie
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Pablo Allietti wrote:
> > hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
> > the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
> > NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
> >
> > 0.5 NO_RDNS
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> > The file that has scores for the default rules is
> > /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf.
> >
> > However, you do not want to make changes to that file, because they
> > will be overwritten every time
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
> the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
> NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
>
> 0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
> variant)
> 0.8 B
> > I understand that the individual test scores are fed through a neural
> > network to derive the final score. So it seems that this network has
> > started to behave badly.
>
> You misunderstand. The neural network (or whatever they're using these
> days - it at least used to be a genetic al
> What is the output of this on your mesages?
>
> spamassassin -tD 2>&1 | pager
>
> What value does it show for BAYES_99 in the content analysis section?
> If it says something other than 4.07 then it confirms that you are not
> running with values from column four network test off. It sounds
>
On Saturday 05 March 2005 1:21 pm, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> I understand that the individual test scores are fed through a neural
> network to derive the final score. So it seems that this network has
> started to behave badly.
You misunderstand. The neural network (or whatever they're using t
Andrew Schulman wrote:
> I'm running spamc/spamd 3.0.2 in Debian. I have Bayesian tests turned on,
> and network tests off.
I am running a similar system. But with network tests turned on. The
network tests such as SURBL[1] are huge factors in increasing spam
classification accuracy for me.
>
Hi,
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:30:59 +0200 Cedric Foll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First I've had a look on my spam scores and i saw a strange behavior,
> BAYES_99 get a lower score (1.9) than BAYES_95 (2.0).
> I've had a look on http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html and
> this score seem
29 matches
Mail list logo
