Re: sa-updates failures since few days : failed to parse line URIBL_SBL_A

2011-12-12 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 12/12/2011 6:17 AM, numberxiii wrote: Hi We encountered a problem with sa-update since the last week-end. It fails with this error : config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/tmp/.spamassassin32504f7H7V4tmp/72_active.cf": uridnsblURIBL_SBL_A sbl.spamhaus.org. A May be it's relat

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread RW
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:01:34 -0500 dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote: > > Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant > > to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep > > a copy for processing in the mass checks. > > No.

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Adam Katz
On 03/10/2011 11:49 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote: > On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote: >> I figure spam capped at 15+ points would be fine, but you'll need >> developer consensus on that. >> > > Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant > to the corpus? If not, I'm ce

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Darxus
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > >On 03/10, John Hardin wrote: > >>Spam is easy to get, diverse ham much less so. > > > >That's funny, since the sa-updates are currently not happening due to a > >lack of spam. > > Odd. Those stats aren't reflected

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: Actually I believe the problem is currently insufficient spam: HAM: 188008 (15 required) SPAM: 51330 (15 required) Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting. - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-dev/2

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Darxus
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote: > Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant > to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep > a copy for processing in the mass checks. No. If all spams scored 15+ hit similar tests, and none of those spams are inclu

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote: On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high scoring spam. After Reading these wiki articles: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Co

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Adam Katz
On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high > scoring spam. > > After Reading these wiki articles: > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CorpusCleaning > I get the impr

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Darxus
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote: > Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the > corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new > rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still > trying to figure out how I can rearrange my configuratio

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 2011/03/10 10:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still trying to figure out how I can rearrange my conf

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adam Moffett wrote: Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still trying to figure out how I can rearrange my conf

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Adam Moffett
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still trying to figure out how I can rearrange my configuration in order to help. http://wiki

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 2011/03/10 6:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote: Hi All, Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I need to dig into my systems to see what

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 3/10/2011 1:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote: Hi All, Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I need to dig into my systems to see what I

Re: sa-updates

2011-03-10 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 3/10/2011 1:41 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote: Is it that there have been no updates or do I need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when? Regards to all Nigel Why fix whats not broken :o) regards Tom