No wonder, the version I had
Jan 15 09:39:29.620 [6248] dbg: dns: 0.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 3.4
1230922, parsed as 3
Jan 15 09:39:29.620 [6248] dbg: channel: current version is 1195375, new
version is 3, skipping channel
Now after updating from SVN it gives
Jan 15 09:45:34.588 [15283] dbg
On 1/11/12 10:09 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
"MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
All I know is I'm using
Jan 12 11:07:09.394 [21138] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0-r1102360
which is obviously newer than 3.3.2.
they whoever built that unreleased development version for you broke
so
> "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
MS> On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
MS> Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
MS> Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
MS> I meant your ve
On 01/12, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
> MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
> Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
> Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I don't remember what that update was for,
On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I meant your version of spamassassin.
3.3.2 was updated yesterday.
if you do
> "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
On 1/9/12 1:33 PM, Juergen Edner wrote:
Hello,
I'm using SpamAssassin for years now to get rid of spam.
Now I wonder which sa-update channels you're using by
default to improve your scan results.
Are you sticking to the default 'updates.spamassassin.org'
Commercial product, maintainer of the Free
