On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > That said, I seem to recall that at least published SARE rule-sets
> > have been mentioned to be added to stock and thus obsoleted.
>
> I suppose this is a point for Daryl (DOS) or whomever "maintains" SARE
> (rea
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> That said, I seem to recall that at least published SARE rule-sets
> have been mentioned to be added to stock and thus obsoleted.
I suppose this is a point for Daryl (DOS) or whomever "maintains" SARE
(read: runs the DNS), but they are not configured to obsolete nicely
On 9-Jun-2009, at 11:36, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Smart move asking one of the more recent additions to the dev
team... ;)
So... how long until 3.3 is ready, then, huh? huh? how long?
... whistles innocently ...
--
Lisa Bonet ate no Basil
> > The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There
> > is no difference in rules, when using sa-update.
> >
> > While it is possible to publish per micro version updates,
> > this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all
> > share the very same rules and updates.
>
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann
> The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There
> is no difference in rules, when using sa-update.
>
> While it is possible to publish per micro version updates,
> this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all
> share the very same rul
