> After some help on the CentOS list, I may have found the problem:
>
>> perl-NetAddr-IP-4.044-1.el5.rf <=== I think that is the problem package
>>
>> I don't know if that version is required by the repoforge packages ...
>> but base contains perl-NetAddr-IP-4.027-5.el5_6
>>
>> I would se
>>> used 'it' for YEARS in production, (commercial product,)
>>> several
>>> platforms, i386, amd64, FreeBSD versions 6.4-7.4.
>>>
>>> ONE DAY, ONE BRAND NEW CLIENT was having real problems with their
>>> mailq. email was backing up.
>>> Two days to figure it out, I deleted the INET6
rpm -e --nodeps perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>> By the way, is there a way to grep for the errant code? My
>>> feeble attempt didn't turn up much:
>>>
>> as in one of my previous emails:
>>
>> 'locate IO-Socket-INET6'
Sorry I missed that!
This gives only docs:
/usr/share/doc/perl-IO-Sock
On 1/9/12 6:25 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/8/12 9:52 PM, email builder wrote:
rpm -e --nodeps perl-IO-Socket-INET6
By the way, is there a way to grep for the errant code? My
feeble attempt didn't turn up much:
as in one of my previous emails:
'locate IO-Socket-INET6'
locate INET6
On 1/8/12 9:52 PM, email builder wrote:
rpm -e --nodeps perl-IO-Socket-INET6
By the way, is there a way to grep for the errant code? My
feeble attempt didn't turn up much:
as in one of my previous emails:
'locate IO-Socket-INET6'
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>> I am the ports maintainer for the FreeBSD version of SpamAssassin.
>>
>> used 'it' for YEARS in production, (commercial product,) several
>> platforms, i386, amd64, FreeBSD versions 6.4-7.4.
>>
>> ONE DAY, ONE BRAND NEW CLIENT was having real problems with their mailq.
> email
>> wa
>> while I*DO* appreciate your suggestion, since I am fairly confident to say
>> I doubt that my config is the problem in a DNS resolver/IPv6 function
>> redefinition, I'm not too interested in proving that point by making
>> those
>> changes on a production machine. Again, thanks anyway.
On 1/7/12 1:56 PM, email builder wrote:
while I*DO* appreciate your suggestion, since I am fairly confident to say I
doubt that my config is the problem in a DNS resolver/IPv6 function
redefinition, I'm not too interested in proving that point by making those
changes on a production machine. Ag
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:00:31 -0800 (PST), email builder wrote:
many packages as native CentOS as I can. I'm going to try to
figure out where to file a bug I guess, but I have a fear I'll get
rebuffed
without any help at all.
build perl rpms from cpan is imho safe and ok, but using cpan d
Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed
updated
version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is
indeed the
case.
>>>
>>> RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
>>> feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug) be
>> Sure, but the point is that my spamassassin and per-Net-DNS (where the
>> error is happening?) are up to date from the CentOS repo so shouldn't
>> they work without an error when spamassassin restarts?
>
> It isn't the job of the SA project to worry about specific distros and
> repos
>>> Does spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i Resolver show the
>>> same error?
>>
>> Yes
>
> And if you temporarily move all your config files and run the same command,
> does
> the error go away?
Yikes, I'm reluctant to do this on a production machine. I have
only made config changes in
On 2012-01-06 21:31, email builder wrote:
Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed updated
version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is indeed the
case.
RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug)
On 1/6/2012 3:31 PM, email builder wrote:
Sure, but the point is that my spamassassin and per-Net-DNS (where the
error is happening?) are up to date from the CentOS repo so
shouldn't they work without an error when spamassassin restarts?
It isn't the job of the SA project to worry about s
>> Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed updated
>> version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is indeed the
>> case.
>
> RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
> feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug) believes that their Enterprise
And if you temporarily move all your config files and run the same command,
does the error go away?
Regards,
KAM
>> Does spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i Resolver show the same
>error?
>
>Yes
>Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed updated
>version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is indeed the
>case.
RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug) believes that their Enterprise Linux
custome
>>> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6
> and are you
>>
>>> 64-bit?
>>
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>
>
> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
> and the latest rpmforge package i
>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
>>
>> line 66 [ OK ]
>>
>> With my spamassassin, perl-Net-DNS and per-IO-Socket-INET6
>> packages all being from CentOS repo, I'm unsure why this would hap
On 2012-01-05 21:28, email builder wrote:
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el
Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined
at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
line 66 [ OK ] With my spamassassin, perl-Net-DNS and
per-IO-Socket-INET6 packages all bei
> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>>
>
> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
>>> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>>
>>>
On 05/01/12 01:28, email builder wrote:
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
If you're
On 1/4/2012 8:41 PM, email builder wrote:
H... how did it get like that in the first place? (and how'd you
know to check perl-Net-DNS?)
The use of packages and extra repositories makes it very difficult to
really pinpoint the exact error but the errors you posted pointed more
to Net::DNS
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
>>>
>>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>
>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>
>> If you're going
>>> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
>>
>>
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>
>
> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>
> If you're going to use rpmforge
What does the following show:
>>
rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>>
>>> Oops, I meant:
>>>
>>> rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>
>> no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>
> Try rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(IO::Socket::INET6)' - Perl depend
On 2012-01-04 23:22, Ned Slider wrote:
On 04/01/12 21:41, email builder wrote:
I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that
package,
besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not
require
perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not reall
On 04/01/12 21:41, email builder wrote:
I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that package,
besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require
perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not really require
perl-IO-Socket-INET6 either.
On 04/01/12 21:33, email builder wrote:
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
If you're goin
email builder wrote:
What does the following show:
rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Oops, I meant:
rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Try rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(IO::Socket::INET6)' - Perl dependencies
in RPM-land are rar
>> What does the following show:
>>
>> rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>
>
> Oops, I meant:
>
> rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Woa wait a minute! Then why this???
yum remove perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
S
> I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that
> package,
> besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require
> perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not really require
> perl-IO-Socket-INET6 either.
You may be right. It was sugg
>What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
I don't use IPv6 that I know of (the errant package is installed whether
I like it or not as a dependency of spamassassin).
32 bit.
>Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat?
I've as
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:46:16 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
in gentoo/funtoo its just perl-cleaner all
but it does not handle arch changes
Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat?
if more do this centos would be
On 04/01/12 15:30, Ned Slider wrote:
What does the following show:
rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Oops, I meant:
rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
On 04/01/12 07:35, email builder wrote:
Anyone have any other insights? Thanks!
I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that
package, besides being more up to date than the distro version also does
not require perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not r
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat?
Try removing/commenting all your cf files especially anything dealing with ip's.
Other than that, I would likely update net dns with cpan at least temporarily
to see if it fixe
Anyone have any other insights? Thanks!
>>> Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
>
>>>
>>> I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
>>> remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
>>> happening again:
>>>
>>> Subro
>> Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
>>
>> I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
>> remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
>> happening again:
>>
>> Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
>>
On 12/31/11 10:46 PM, email builder wrote:
Hi,
Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
happening again:
Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF
42 matches
Mail list logo
