Yes, the learn client does not try to keep up with what it has done, or not
done, before - that is handled by the server (the Bayes engine).
I believe there is no reasonable way for the client to achieve this, anyway -
it cannot reliably modify your maildir in such a way that it can be assured o
> On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> To determine if a mail already has been learned, SA needs to have a
>> look
>> at the mail.
On 06.05.09 17:34, LuKreme wrote:
> Mightn't it be helpful if it could keep a cache of filenames?
Useless, they can change. I hope that SA reads o
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 19:55 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 6-May-2009, at 19:46, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
> > follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of auto-
> > learning and before local delivery is u
On 6-May-2009, at 19:46, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of
auto-
learning and before local delivery is unclear to you?
This has nothing to do with either autole
Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of auto-
learning and before local delivery is unclear to you?
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:34 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wr
On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:43 -0600, ɹןʇnqן wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not. Since all IMAP
messages are stored with unique names, is there some easy way to
cr
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:23 -0500, LuKreme wrote:
> > It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
> > db storage.
>
> It odes int aht it doesn't relearn then, but it doesn't in terms of
> processing them. Lemme explain.
I already explained in this very thread why there is
On 6-May-2009, at 07:13, RW wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 01:43:08 -0600
ɹןʇnqן wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not.
It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
db storage.
It odes int aht it
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:43 -0600, ɹןʇnqן wrote:
> The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
> whether or not it has learned a message or not. Since all IMAP
> messages are stored with unique names, is there some easy way to
> create a cache of the messages it has check
Hi,
processes. It has even, on occasion, necessitated a reboot when i could not
get the system to kill the process. I've taken to trying to scan it daily and
manually delete the spam, but that's not always possible.
This hint might be totally wrong, but last time I saw such a behavior it
was
On Wed, 6 May 2009 01:43:08 -0600
ɹןʇnqן wrote:
> The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
> whether or not it has learned a message or not.
It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
db storage.
11 matches
Mail list logo
